The Cradle of Humankind, a UNESCO World Heritage Site in South Africa, is one of the world’s richest sources of early human fossils. Located near Johannesburg, it includes key sites like Sterkfontein, Swartkrans, Kromdraai, and Rising Star Cave, where fossils like “Mrs. Ples” and “Little Foot” were found. This region has been central to understanding human evolution.
A major breakthrough came in 2013 with the discovery of Homo naledi in the Rising Star Cave system. Unlike other fossils embedded in hard breccia, Homo naledi remains were found in soft sediments. This species displayed a puzzling mix of primitive traits (small brain size, curved fingers) and advanced ones (long legs, hand structure suited for tool use), challenging traditional views of the Homo genus.
The Dinaledi Chamber within Rising Star yielded over 1,500 fossils from at least 15 individuals, with more found in other chambers like Lesedi. Interestingly, these fossils were found without other animal bones and showed little sediment disturbance—suggesting intentional placement and even possible mortuary practices, like funerary caching.
Dating the fossils has proven difficult. Initial estimates placed them between 335,000 and 241,000 years ago, but some evidence suggests they could be much older—perhaps over 500,000 years. This uncertainty raises questions about whether Homo naledi was a primitive ancestor or a relic population that coexisted with early Homo sapiens.
The complex anatomy of Homo naledi, including traits similar to Australopithecus and Homo erectus, blurs the lines in the hominin family tree. Its place in human evolution remains debated, with three scenarios proposed: a Pliocene origin (over 3 million years ago), an early Pleistocene presence, or a late Pleistocene survival into the age of modern humans.
The implications are profound. If Homo naledi performed symbolic acts like burial or fire use, it suggests that cultural behavior and cognitive complexity were not limited to large-brained species. Whether these behaviors evolved independently or reflect shared ancestry, Homo naledi continues to reshape how we view human evolution.
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:04
the Cradle of Humankind is a UNESCO
0:06
World Heritage site located in South
0:08
Africa renowned as one of the world's
0:10
richest sources of hominin fossils
0:13
situated about 50 km northwest of
0:16
Johannesburg this area contains a
0:18
network of limestone caves including
0:20
famous sites like Sturk Fontaine Swart
0:23
Crans Crom Dry and Rising Star these
0:26
caves have yielded some of the most
0:28
significant discoveries in paleo
0:30
anthropology including the nearly
0:32
complete Oralopythecus Africana skull
0:35
known as Mrs please and the ancient
0:37
little foot skeleton the site gets its
0:40
name because it is considered a key
0:42
location in the story of human evolution
0:44
with fossils spanning millions of years
0:46
that show crucial transitions in our
0:48
ancestral lineage designated a world
0:51
heritage site in 1999 the cradle of
0:54
humankind continues to shape our
0:56
understanding of where and how early
0:58
humans evolved this karstic region has
1:01
yielded numerous fossil specimens often
1:04
heavily mineralized and embedded in
1:06
rockhard brea which are typically over 2
1:08
million years old however a
1:10
transformative discovery was made in
1:13
2013 with the unearthing of homooni in
1:16
the rising star cave system a finding
1:18
that challenged long-standing
1:20
assumptions in the field spearheaded by
1:22
paleoanthropologist Lee Burer who had
1:25
previously been instrumental in the
1:26
recovery of Oralopythecus fossils from
1:29
other sites within the cradle including
1:31
Glattisvale and Malipa the investigation
1:34
into this new site was initially
1:35
expected to yield similar remains
1:38
instead researchers were astonished to
1:40
find that the hominin material from the
1:42
rising star caves was not fossilized in
1:44
hard breia but rather embedded in soft
1:47
mudlike sediments this indicated a
1:50
starkly different preservation context
1:53
more striking was the morphology of the
1:55
fossils themselves although some
1:57
anatomical features suggested a degree
1:59
of affinity with oralopythecus in many
2:02
critical respects the remains were
2:04
distinct exhibiting a unique mosaic of
2:07
primitive and derived traits this blend
2:09
positioned homo nady in a curious and
2:12
unexpected place within the hominin
2:14
lineage raising profound questions about
2:17
the diversity and evolutionary
2:19
complexity of the genus Homo the
2:21
evidence uncovered in the rising star
2:23
cave system has been remarkably dense
2:25
and informative the Dinoiti chamber
2:27
alone yielded over
2:29
1,550 fossil specimens representing a
2:32
minimum of 15 individuals these include
2:36
both bone and dental fragments some of
2:38
which conjoined to form more complete
2:40
anatomical specimens additional remains
2:43
were recovered from the hill antichamber
2:45
and an on another locality both situated
2:48
within the same cave system another
2:50
significant assemblage comprising 131
2:53
fossils representing at least three and
2:56
likely four individuals was found in the
2:58
nearby but separately seedi chamber
3:01
further discoveries have also been
3:03
reported from the broader Dinleti
3:05
subsystem and other yet unnamed areas of
3:07
the cave complex while details of these
3:10
newer finds remain unpublished they
3:12
suggest the potential for even more
3:14
groundbreaking revelations in the near
3:16
future this unprecedented concentration
3:18
of hominin fossils within a confined
3:21
cave system paired with the unusual
3:23
context of deposition and the unique
3:26
anatomical profile of homo nady has not
3:29
only expanded the known diversity of
3:31
early human relatives but also reignited
3:33
debates concerning their behavior
3:36
cognitive abilities and place within our
3:38
evolutionary tree the Rising Star Cave
3:41
system located in South Africa is a vast
3:44
and complex network of underground
3:46
passages at least 4,000 m long formed
3:49
within ancient Dolommitic rock known as
3:51
the Malmani subgroup currently four
3:54
entrances to the cave system have been
3:56
identified though only three are open
3:58
today while one is sealed a specific
4:01
part of this cave called the Dinleti
4:03
subsystem lies around 30 m below the
4:06
surface and is over 70 m away in a
4:09
straight line from the nearest known
4:11
entrance this chamber is connected to
4:13
the rest of the cave system through a
4:15
narrow and steep passage known as the
4:17
chute when scientists first studied the
4:19
Dino subsystem they realized that the
4:22
way sediments mud rocks and other
4:25
materials built up there was not
4:27
straightforward over long periods
4:29
materials entered the cave formed rock
4:32
layers known as flowstones then were
4:34
eroded or washed away and finally some
4:36
sediment settled into the din chamber
4:38
these materials did not come all at once
4:40
but in multiple cycles most of the
4:43
Homoniti fossils in the Dinoliti chamber
4:45
were found in what researchers call unit
4:48
3 sediments a layer of younger soft cave
4:51
flooror materials according to the
4:53
scientists who first studied the site
4:55
the Dinoiti chamber was quite isolated
4:58
at the time these sediments were
4:59
deposited in other words very little new
5:02
sediment was entering from the rest of
5:04
the cave they also argued that another
5:06
nearby chamber Dragon's Back Chamber
5:08
probably wasn't the source of the Homo
5:10
Nleti fossils either however not all
5:13
researchers agree some suggest that the
5:15
remains and sediments may have entered
5:17
the chamber from a different entrance
5:18
which is now sealed off caves like these
5:21
are very dynamic systems sometimes large
5:24
rocks can fall and block entire
5:26
entrances changing how materials enter
5:28
and move through them what makes the
5:30
Dino Lady Chamber particularly
5:32
interesting is that it holds a very high
5:34
number of hominin fossils but almost no
5:37
bones from other animals this is very
5:40
unusual in most other fossil-rich caves
5:42
in the cradle of humankind hominin bones
5:45
are found alongside a variety of other
5:47
animal remains all jumbled together and
5:50
often cemented into hard rock or brechia
5:53
by flow stones in contrast the homonyiti
5:56
bones were found in loose muddy
5:58
sediments not hard brechia this suggests
6:01
that the fossils were deposited
6:02
differently perhaps in more than one
6:04
episode and didn't get mixed with the
6:06
bones of other animals because of this
6:09
scientists must be very cautious in
6:11
interpreting the exact age and origin of
6:13
the fossils determining the age of Homo
6:16
Nady has been one of the most
6:18
challenging aspects of studying this
6:20
species when the fossils were first
6:22
reported the scientists offered very
6:24
limited information about their age the
6:26
original research barely addressed the
6:28
issue with the authors noting the
6:30
complexity of the cave's layers and
6:32
choosing not to speculate they mentioned
6:34
that they were working on new dating
6:36
techniques that could help solve this
6:38
problem more reliably subsequent studies
6:40
aimed to clarify the age using several
6:42
scientific methods the sediments where
6:45
the fossils were found and three
6:47
fossilized teeth of Homo Nady were
6:49
analyzed using advanced dating
6:51
techniques these efforts gave a minimum
6:53
age for the overlying flow stone of
6:55
about
6:56
242,000 years and the best estimate for
7:00
the fossils themselves was around
7:02
253,000 years another study proposed a
7:05
slightly wider age range between
7:08
335,000 and
7:10
241,000 years ago however many of these
7:13
results are considered minimum estimates
7:16
meaning the actual fossils might be
7:18
older some evidence from the cave even
7:20
hints at ages possibly as old as 500,000
7:23
years or more and in some cases even
7:26
older than 780,000 years the challenge
7:29
lies in the fact that these dating
7:31
methods are sensitive to environmental
7:33
factors and can sometimes be unreliable
7:35
in cave settings because of this the age
7:38
of homo nady remains uncertain this
7:41
uncertainty has important implications
7:42
for human evolution if the species is
7:45
relatively young it may have lived
7:47
alongside early modern humans and other
7:49
advanced hominins if it is much older it
7:52
might represent an earlier stage in
7:54
human evolution either way refining its
7:56
age is crucial for understanding its
7:58
place in our evolutionary story the
8:01
fossil evidence for Homon provides
8:03
important information about parts of the
8:05
body like the spine limbs hands and feet
8:08
that are often not well preserved in the
8:10
fossils of other ancient human relatives
8:12
found in southern Africa this gives
8:15
scientists a rare and detailed look at
8:17
how Homon Lady may have moved and lived
8:20
in terms of body structure Homona Lady
8:23
shows a mix of primitive and more
8:24
advanced features for example its brain
8:27
size is quite small about 550 cm which
8:31
is smaller than early homo species like
8:33
Homo or Gastra it also had a small body
8:36
mass however there are also more modern
8:39
traits like the elongated lower limbs
8:41
and reduced body size differences
8:43
between males and females which are more
8:46
similar to those seen in later human
8:47
species looking at the skull the shape
8:50
and features of the cranium are similar
8:52
to early homo species especially homo
8:55
orastaster but with a smaller brain the
8:57
teeth are also interesting they combine
9:00
characteristics found in both modern
9:02
humans and more primitive hominins and
9:04
some of the features are even unusual
9:06
compared to other species for example
9:09
both the permanent and deciduous teeth
9:12
have a mix of traits seen in early human
9:14
ancestors and modern humans one of the
9:17
most striking aspects of Homo Nady is
9:19
its hands the structure of the hands is
9:22
mostly derived meaning it's more similar
9:24
to modern humans and suggests that
9:26
Homonady was capable of tasks like tool
9:29
use or grasping however its pelvis and
9:32
hip joint are more primitive and its
9:34
curved footbones suggest it still had
9:36
adaptations for climbing not just
9:38
walking even the femurss are unusual
9:40
compared to other early human species
9:43
adding to the mystery of how Homo Nolady
9:45
moved and lived because of this
9:47
combination of features both primitive
9:49
and advanced scientists have debated
9:51
whether Homo Nolady truly belongs in the
9:53
genus Homo the genus is typically used
9:56
for species with more modern humanlike
9:58
traits but Homo Noliti still has many
10:01
features that are much older and more
10:03
primitive in a study that looked at the
10:05
cranium and teeth researchers suggested
10:07
that homoonady could have lived around
10:10
900,000 years ago with some uncertainty
10:12
in the exact date the study also pointed
10:15
out that homon could be equally closely
10:17
related to other species like Oralopycus
10:20
sadiba or even modern humans making its
10:23
exact place on the family tree unclear
10:26
there is no direct ancestor or
10:28
descendant species that we know of for
10:29
homo nady which adds to the complexity
10:32
of understanding where this species fits
10:34
in the evolutionary story the
10:36
evolutionary story of homo nady
10:39
continues to stir debate among
10:41
paleoanthropologists especially when it
10:43
comes to its place on the human family
10:45
tree at the heart of this debate are
10:48
three distinct scenarios each depending
10:50
on how old the fossils from the dinoi
10:52
chamber truly are the plyiosene age
10:55
scenario the early pleaene scenario and
10:59
the late pleaene scenario one theory
11:02
proposes that homo nady originated in
11:04
the late plyene over 3 million years ago
11:08
if this is true it means that key
11:09
branches of the homo lineage diverged
11:11
much earlier than we once believed
11:13
anatomically Homonyiti shows traits that
11:16
link it to Homo erectus perhaps even
11:18
suggesting a closer evolutionary
11:20
relationship between these two species
11:23
than either share with Homohabilis in
11:25
this view Homohabilis may have evolved
11:27
from an even more ancient ancestor
11:30
placing Homoniti on a separate path its
11:32
relatively primitive features especially
11:35
compared to later Homo species support
11:37
the idea that its lineage emerged before
11:39
the rise of Homo erectus around 1.8 8
11:42
million years ago by the time we reach
11:45
2.1 million years ago fossil evidence
11:48
reveals a diverse cast of early
11:49
homoecies coexisting across Africa
11:52
before that however the fossil record
11:55
became sparse and difficult to interpret
11:57
with only fragmentaryary remains
11:59
pointing to the earliest members of our
12:01
genus it's during this time of shifting
12:03
environments and drying climates that
12:05
early homoecies began to adapt eating a
12:09
broader diet that included meat and
12:11
crafting the first stone tools as these
12:13
early humans evolved and spread across
12:15
eastern and southern Africa they
12:17
developed varied body sizes and
12:19
increasing brain capacities setting the
12:22
stage for species like Homo erectus to
12:25
leave Africa and explore new continents
12:27
if the fossils of Homo Noliti are dated
12:30
to the early pleaene it aligns well with
12:32
the idea that it was one of several
12:34
early homoecies thriving in Africa in
12:37
this scenario Homonyiti may have been an
12:40
evolutionary sibling or even a possible
12:42
ancestor of Homo erectus sharing the
12:45
landscape of southern Africa in a
12:47
complex mosaic of human forms much like
12:50
how Homohabilis and Homo erectus
12:52
coexisted elsewhere but what if the
12:54
fossils are younger from the late
12:56
pleaene less than a million years old
12:59
that would be even more remarkable it
13:01
would mean that homo nades survived for
13:04
far longer than previously imagined
13:06
coexisting with other human species
13:08
including early homo sapiens its
13:11
generalist teeth point to a flexible
13:13
diet and its physical abilities like
13:15
tool use and navigation mirror those of
13:18
more advanced humans this scenario
13:21
suggests a world in which multiple human
13:23
species with different brain sizes and
13:25
cultural capacities lived side by side
13:28
competing perhaps even interacting and
13:31
here's where it gets even more
13:32
intriguing if Homo Noliti lived during
13:35
the late pleaene could some
13:37
archaeological artifacts previously
13:39
attributed to archaic homo sapiens have
13:41
been made by Homo Nolady the possibility
13:44
is real but without direct associations
13:46
between bones and tools unraveling who
13:49
made what remains a daunting challenge
13:52
still the mystery of Homo Nady pushes us
13:54
to rethink old assumptions it reminds us
13:57
that human evolution wasn't a straight
13:59
line it was a branching tangled story
14:02
filled with surprises and homon whether
14:05
ancient pioneer or resilient survivor
14:08
has become one of its most fascinating
14:10
chapters for many years the study of
14:12
human evolution has been largely shaped
14:14
by discoveries of early hominins like
14:17
Oralopythecus at wellestablished sites
14:20
such as Crumbry Sturk Fontine and
14:23
Schwart Crrons in the cradle of
14:25
humankind however the discovery of Homo
14:28
Nalady by Lee Burgerer marked an
14:30
exciting and groundbreaking shift in our
14:32
understanding he not only found an
14:34
important new source of evidence but
14:36
also overcame significant challenges in
14:38
extracting fossils from deep within the
14:40
rising star cave system the morphology
14:43
of Homo Nady is a unique blend of
14:45
primitive and derived traits making it
14:48
difficult to categorize while
14:50
researchers have analyzed different
14:51
regions of the skeleton separately a far
14:54
more complex task lies ahead combining
14:57
all the evidence to understand where
14:59
homoleti fits in the broader narrative
15:01
of human evolution the challenge will be
15:04
determining whether it makes sense to
15:05
keep homoleti within the genus homo
15:08
additionally the striking lack of
15:10
morphological variation among the
15:12
fossils of homo nady raises questions
15:15
about the diversity of this species
15:17
which will require further investigation
15:19
although Burgger and others argue that
15:21
the geological age of homon should not
15:24
directly affect its classification
15:26
understanding its age is crucial for
15:28
determining its relationship to other
15:30
hominins the age of homon is still
15:33
debated if it's between 1 and 2 million
15:36
years old it could provide valuable
15:38
insights into the evolutionary sequence
15:40
of traits in early humans helping
15:42
scientists understand how specific parts
15:45
of the skeleton evolved however if Homo
15:48
Nolidi is much younger between 300,000
15:51
and 200,000 years old it could represent
15:54
a local relic population that survived
15:56
much longer than expected preserving
15:59
features from much earlier stages of
16:01
human evolution in this case its unique
16:04
combination of traits could be a result
16:05
of genetic isolation rather than the
16:08
evolutionary trends seen in other
16:10
hominin species throughout human history
16:13
honoring the dead has been a deeply
16:15
meaningful cultural act from carefully
16:17
dug burial pits to symbolic rituals of
16:20
remembrance until recently such complex
16:23
behaviors including burials symbolic
16:25
engravings and the controlled use of
16:27
fire were believed to be unique to Homo
16:30
sapiens but the discovery of Homo Nolady
16:33
is challenging that long-held assumption
16:35
the Homo Noliti were located in
16:37
hard-to-reach chambers within the rising
16:39
star cave system there's also an ongoing
16:42
debate about how the bones got there
16:44
some scientists think the bodies were
16:46
not moved far within the cave while
16:48
others point out that certain patterns
16:49
of bone breakage suggest some kind of
16:51
movement occurred possibly through
16:53
another entrance that is no longer open
16:56
the possibility of natural deposition
16:58
through a now blocked entrance remains
17:00
open and more research is needed to
17:02
fully understand how these remarkable
17:04
fossils came to rest where they did in
17:07
short while it's tempting to think these
17:09
individuals were deliberately placed in
17:10
the dino lady chamber perhaps even by
17:13
other members of their species the
17:15
extraordinary placement raises a
17:17
profound question why would members of a
17:20
smallrained hominin species repeatedly
17:22
enter such a dangerous and pitch black
17:25
environment unless they had a meaningful
17:27
reason one compelling possibility
17:30
iserary caching the deliberate placement
17:33
of bodies or body parts in hidden remote
17:36
locations scientists argue that three
17:38
key conditions must be met to support
17:40
this idea evidence of artificial light
17:43
no signs of water-based transport and
17:46
the articulation of skeletal remains
17:48
meaning bones were still connected as
17:50
they would be in intact bodies burgger
17:52
and his team have proposed that Home
17:54
Lady might have used controlled fire to
17:56
illuminate the cave enabling them to
17:58
carry out these acts though the presence
18:01
of soot or charcoal would support this
18:03
such evidence remains elusive and the
18:06
idea of fire use remains speculative for
18:08
now the Rising Star Caves narrow
18:10
twisting passages and vertical fissures
18:13
make it unlikely that these bones simply
18:15
washed into the chamber in many cases
18:18
skeletal remains appear articulated
18:21
suggesting individuals were deposited
18:23
whole possibly placed with care some
18:25
researchers interpret sediment
18:27
disturbances in the area as signs of
18:29
deliberate burial though others argue
18:31
the differences in soil composition are
18:33
too minor to be conclusive moreover the
18:36
absence of clear grave outlines and the
18:38
presence of mixed remains from multiple
18:40
individuals complicate the burial theory
18:43
further debate surrounds what some
18:45
researchers describe as deliberate
18:47
engravings cross-hatch markings on a
18:49
stone pillar within the cave similar
18:52
marks however are known to occur
18:53
naturally from tectonic shifts in nearby
18:56
caves likewise a stone fragment found
18:59
near one skeleton was initially thought
19:01
to be a tool but others contend it's
19:03
simply a piece of limestone that fell
19:04
from the cave roof still the broader
19:07
context of the fines their location the
19:09
condition of the remains and the
19:11
possible use of fire points toward
19:13
intentional behavior if Homonoliti was
19:15
indeed engaging in some form of mortuary
19:18
practice it would represent one of the
19:20
earliest known examples of symbolic or
19:22
ritualized behavior in hominins this
19:25
challenges the assumption that such
19:26
cognitive abilities were exclusive to
19:28
large-brained humans and suggests that
19:31
emotional awareness social bonding and
19:33
cultural expression may have deeper
19:36
roots in our evolutionary past but how
19:38
do these behaviors fit within the
19:40
broader human family scientists propose
19:43
three possibilities perhaps homoniti
19:45
developed these behaviors independently
19:48
a case of parallel evolution or maybe
19:50
such practices go back even further
19:53
inherited from a shared ancestor in the
19:55
plyasene or early pleaene diverging
19:58
later between species a third
20:00
possibility is cultural exchange where
20:03
homonyiti and early homo sapiens living
20:06
in close proximity borrowed and shared
20:08
traditions across groups the emotional
20:11
dimension of these acts is hard to
20:13
ignore the repeated use of the same
20:15
burial space the engravings on nearby
20:17
stone walls all suggest shared beliefs
20:20
memory and social cohesion much like
20:24
Neanderthalss who left behind their own
20:26
marks of symbolic behavior Homo Nady may
20:29
have experienced a sense of community
20:32
loss and meaning and perhaps most
20:34
surprising of all is that Homo Nady had
20:37
a brain about onethird the size of ours
20:40
these discoveries defy the old
20:42
assumption that bigger brains mean more
20:44
complex culture instead they point to
20:47
something deeper a cultural and
20:49
empathetic niche where connection
20:52
cooperation and shared intention drove
20:54
innovation from crafting stone tools to
20:57
possibly mastering fire smallrained
21:00
hominins like Homo Nlei played a vital
21:03
role in shaping the human journey their
21:05
story reminds us that intelligence is
21:07
not measured by brain volume alone but
21:09
also by the capacity to care to create
21:12
and to
#Social Sciences
#Anthropology
#Archaeology
#Paleontology

