0:04
the Cradle of Humankind is a UNESCO
0:06
World Heritage site located in South
0:08
Africa renowned as one of the world's
0:10
richest sources of hominin fossils
0:13
situated about 50 km northwest of
0:16
Johannesburg this area contains a
0:18
network of limestone caves including
0:20
famous sites like Sturk Fontaine Swart
0:23
Crans Crom Dry and Rising Star these
0:26
caves have yielded some of the most
0:28
significant discoveries in paleo
0:30
anthropology including the nearly
0:32
complete Oralopythecus Africana skull
0:35
known as Mrs please and the ancient
0:37
little foot skeleton the site gets its
0:40
name because it is considered a key
0:42
location in the story of human evolution
0:44
with fossils spanning millions of years
0:46
that show crucial transitions in our
0:48
ancestral lineage designated a world
0:51
heritage site in 1999 the cradle of
0:54
humankind continues to shape our
0:56
understanding of where and how early
0:58
humans evolved this karstic region has
1:01
yielded numerous fossil specimens often
1:04
heavily mineralized and embedded in
1:06
rockhard brea which are typically over 2
1:08
million years old however a
1:10
transformative discovery was made in
1:13
2013 with the unearthing of homooni in
1:16
the rising star cave system a finding
1:18
that challenged long-standing
1:20
assumptions in the field spearheaded by
1:22
paleoanthropologist Lee Burer who had
1:25
previously been instrumental in the
1:26
recovery of Oralopythecus fossils from
1:29
other sites within the cradle including
1:31
Glattisvale and Malipa the investigation
1:34
into this new site was initially
1:35
expected to yield similar remains
1:38
instead researchers were astonished to
1:40
find that the hominin material from the
1:42
rising star caves was not fossilized in
1:44
hard breia but rather embedded in soft
1:47
mudlike sediments this indicated a
1:50
starkly different preservation context
1:53
more striking was the morphology of the
1:55
fossils themselves although some
1:57
anatomical features suggested a degree
1:59
of affinity with oralopythecus in many
2:02
critical respects the remains were
2:04
distinct exhibiting a unique mosaic of
2:07
primitive and derived traits this blend
2:09
positioned homo nady in a curious and
2:12
unexpected place within the hominin
2:14
lineage raising profound questions about
2:17
the diversity and evolutionary
2:19
complexity of the genus Homo the
2:21
evidence uncovered in the rising star
2:23
cave system has been remarkably dense
2:25
and informative the Dinoiti chamber
2:29
1,550 fossil specimens representing a
2:32
minimum of 15 individuals these include
2:36
both bone and dental fragments some of
2:38
which conjoined to form more complete
2:40
anatomical specimens additional remains
2:43
were recovered from the hill antichamber
2:45
and an on another locality both situated
2:48
within the same cave system another
2:50
significant assemblage comprising 131
2:53
fossils representing at least three and
2:56
likely four individuals was found in the
2:58
nearby but separately seedi chamber
3:01
further discoveries have also been
3:03
reported from the broader Dinleti
3:05
subsystem and other yet unnamed areas of
3:07
the cave complex while details of these
3:10
newer finds remain unpublished they
3:12
suggest the potential for even more
3:14
groundbreaking revelations in the near
3:16
future this unprecedented concentration
3:18
of hominin fossils within a confined
3:21
cave system paired with the unusual
3:23
context of deposition and the unique
3:26
anatomical profile of homo nady has not
3:29
only expanded the known diversity of
3:31
early human relatives but also reignited
3:33
debates concerning their behavior
3:36
cognitive abilities and place within our
3:38
evolutionary tree the Rising Star Cave
3:41
system located in South Africa is a vast
3:44
and complex network of underground
3:46
passages at least 4,000 m long formed
3:49
within ancient Dolommitic rock known as
3:51
the Malmani subgroup currently four
3:54
entrances to the cave system have been
3:56
identified though only three are open
3:58
today while one is sealed a specific
4:01
part of this cave called the Dinleti
4:03
subsystem lies around 30 m below the
4:06
surface and is over 70 m away in a
4:09
straight line from the nearest known
4:11
entrance this chamber is connected to
4:13
the rest of the cave system through a
4:15
narrow and steep passage known as the
4:17
chute when scientists first studied the
4:19
Dino subsystem they realized that the
4:22
way sediments mud rocks and other
4:25
materials built up there was not
4:27
straightforward over long periods
4:29
materials entered the cave formed rock
4:32
layers known as flowstones then were
4:34
eroded or washed away and finally some
4:36
sediment settled into the din chamber
4:38
these materials did not come all at once
4:40
but in multiple cycles most of the
4:43
Homoniti fossils in the Dinoliti chamber
4:45
were found in what researchers call unit
4:48
3 sediments a layer of younger soft cave
4:51
flooror materials according to the
4:53
scientists who first studied the site
4:55
the Dinoiti chamber was quite isolated
4:58
at the time these sediments were
4:59
deposited in other words very little new
5:02
sediment was entering from the rest of
5:04
the cave they also argued that another
5:06
nearby chamber Dragon's Back Chamber
5:08
probably wasn't the source of the Homo
5:10
Nleti fossils either however not all
5:13
researchers agree some suggest that the
5:15
remains and sediments may have entered
5:17
the chamber from a different entrance
5:18
which is now sealed off caves like these
5:21
are very dynamic systems sometimes large
5:24
rocks can fall and block entire
5:26
entrances changing how materials enter
5:28
and move through them what makes the
5:30
Dino Lady Chamber particularly
5:32
interesting is that it holds a very high
5:34
number of hominin fossils but almost no
5:37
bones from other animals this is very
5:40
unusual in most other fossil-rich caves
5:42
in the cradle of humankind hominin bones
5:45
are found alongside a variety of other
5:47
animal remains all jumbled together and
5:50
often cemented into hard rock or brechia
5:53
by flow stones in contrast the homonyiti
5:56
bones were found in loose muddy
5:58
sediments not hard brechia this suggests
6:01
that the fossils were deposited
6:02
differently perhaps in more than one
6:04
episode and didn't get mixed with the
6:06
bones of other animals because of this
6:09
scientists must be very cautious in
6:11
interpreting the exact age and origin of
6:13
the fossils determining the age of Homo
6:16
Nady has been one of the most
6:18
challenging aspects of studying this
6:20
species when the fossils were first
6:22
reported the scientists offered very
6:24
limited information about their age the
6:26
original research barely addressed the
6:28
issue with the authors noting the
6:30
complexity of the cave's layers and
6:32
choosing not to speculate they mentioned
6:34
that they were working on new dating
6:36
techniques that could help solve this
6:38
problem more reliably subsequent studies
6:40
aimed to clarify the age using several
6:42
scientific methods the sediments where
6:45
the fossils were found and three
6:47
fossilized teeth of Homo Nady were
6:49
analyzed using advanced dating
6:51
techniques these efforts gave a minimum
6:53
age for the overlying flow stone of
6:56
242,000 years and the best estimate for
7:00
the fossils themselves was around
7:02
253,000 years another study proposed a
7:05
slightly wider age range between
7:10
241,000 years ago however many of these
7:13
results are considered minimum estimates
7:16
meaning the actual fossils might be
7:18
older some evidence from the cave even
7:20
hints at ages possibly as old as 500,000
7:23
years or more and in some cases even
7:26
older than 780,000 years the challenge
7:29
lies in the fact that these dating
7:31
methods are sensitive to environmental
7:33
factors and can sometimes be unreliable
7:35
in cave settings because of this the age
7:38
of homo nady remains uncertain this
7:41
uncertainty has important implications
7:42
for human evolution if the species is
7:45
relatively young it may have lived
7:47
alongside early modern humans and other
7:49
advanced hominins if it is much older it
7:52
might represent an earlier stage in
7:54
human evolution either way refining its
7:56
age is crucial for understanding its
7:58
place in our evolutionary story the
8:01
fossil evidence for Homon provides
8:03
important information about parts of the
8:05
body like the spine limbs hands and feet
8:08
that are often not well preserved in the
8:10
fossils of other ancient human relatives
8:12
found in southern Africa this gives
8:15
scientists a rare and detailed look at
8:17
how Homon Lady may have moved and lived
8:20
in terms of body structure Homona Lady
8:23
shows a mix of primitive and more
8:24
advanced features for example its brain
8:27
size is quite small about 550 cm which
8:31
is smaller than early homo species like
8:33
Homo or Gastra it also had a small body
8:36
mass however there are also more modern
8:39
traits like the elongated lower limbs
8:41
and reduced body size differences
8:43
between males and females which are more
8:46
similar to those seen in later human
8:47
species looking at the skull the shape
8:50
and features of the cranium are similar
8:52
to early homo species especially homo
8:55
orastaster but with a smaller brain the
8:57
teeth are also interesting they combine
9:00
characteristics found in both modern
9:02
humans and more primitive hominins and
9:04
some of the features are even unusual
9:06
compared to other species for example
9:09
both the permanent and deciduous teeth
9:12
have a mix of traits seen in early human
9:14
ancestors and modern humans one of the
9:17
most striking aspects of Homo Nady is
9:19
its hands the structure of the hands is
9:22
mostly derived meaning it's more similar
9:24
to modern humans and suggests that
9:26
Homonady was capable of tasks like tool
9:29
use or grasping however its pelvis and
9:32
hip joint are more primitive and its
9:34
curved footbones suggest it still had
9:36
adaptations for climbing not just
9:38
walking even the femurss are unusual
9:40
compared to other early human species
9:43
adding to the mystery of how Homo Nolady
9:45
moved and lived because of this
9:47
combination of features both primitive
9:49
and advanced scientists have debated
9:51
whether Homo Nolady truly belongs in the
9:53
genus Homo the genus is typically used
9:56
for species with more modern humanlike
9:58
traits but Homo Noliti still has many
10:01
features that are much older and more
10:03
primitive in a study that looked at the
10:05
cranium and teeth researchers suggested
10:07
that homoonady could have lived around
10:10
900,000 years ago with some uncertainty
10:12
in the exact date the study also pointed
10:15
out that homon could be equally closely
10:17
related to other species like Oralopycus
10:20
sadiba or even modern humans making its
10:23
exact place on the family tree unclear
10:26
there is no direct ancestor or
10:28
descendant species that we know of for
10:29
homo nady which adds to the complexity
10:32
of understanding where this species fits
10:34
in the evolutionary story the
10:36
evolutionary story of homo nady
10:39
continues to stir debate among
10:41
paleoanthropologists especially when it
10:43
comes to its place on the human family
10:45
tree at the heart of this debate are
10:48
three distinct scenarios each depending
10:50
on how old the fossils from the dinoi
10:52
chamber truly are the plyiosene age
10:55
scenario the early pleaene scenario and
10:59
the late pleaene scenario one theory
11:02
proposes that homo nady originated in
11:04
the late plyene over 3 million years ago
11:08
if this is true it means that key
11:09
branches of the homo lineage diverged
11:11
much earlier than we once believed
11:13
anatomically Homonyiti shows traits that
11:16
link it to Homo erectus perhaps even
11:18
suggesting a closer evolutionary
11:20
relationship between these two species
11:23
than either share with Homohabilis in
11:25
this view Homohabilis may have evolved
11:27
from an even more ancient ancestor
11:30
placing Homoniti on a separate path its
11:32
relatively primitive features especially
11:35
compared to later Homo species support
11:37
the idea that its lineage emerged before
11:39
the rise of Homo erectus around 1.8 8
11:42
million years ago by the time we reach
11:45
2.1 million years ago fossil evidence
11:48
reveals a diverse cast of early
11:49
homoecies coexisting across Africa
11:52
before that however the fossil record
11:55
became sparse and difficult to interpret
11:57
with only fragmentaryary remains
11:59
pointing to the earliest members of our
12:01
genus it's during this time of shifting
12:03
environments and drying climates that
12:05
early homoecies began to adapt eating a
12:09
broader diet that included meat and
12:11
crafting the first stone tools as these
12:13
early humans evolved and spread across
12:15
eastern and southern Africa they
12:17
developed varied body sizes and
12:19
increasing brain capacities setting the
12:22
stage for species like Homo erectus to
12:25
leave Africa and explore new continents
12:27
if the fossils of Homo Noliti are dated
12:30
to the early pleaene it aligns well with
12:32
the idea that it was one of several
12:34
early homoecies thriving in Africa in
12:37
this scenario Homonyiti may have been an
12:40
evolutionary sibling or even a possible
12:42
ancestor of Homo erectus sharing the
12:45
landscape of southern Africa in a
12:47
complex mosaic of human forms much like
12:50
how Homohabilis and Homo erectus
12:52
coexisted elsewhere but what if the
12:54
fossils are younger from the late
12:56
pleaene less than a million years old
12:59
that would be even more remarkable it
13:01
would mean that homo nades survived for
13:04
far longer than previously imagined
13:06
coexisting with other human species
13:08
including early homo sapiens its
13:11
generalist teeth point to a flexible
13:13
diet and its physical abilities like
13:15
tool use and navigation mirror those of
13:18
more advanced humans this scenario
13:21
suggests a world in which multiple human
13:23
species with different brain sizes and
13:25
cultural capacities lived side by side
13:28
competing perhaps even interacting and
13:31
here's where it gets even more
13:32
intriguing if Homo Noliti lived during
13:35
the late pleaene could some
13:37
archaeological artifacts previously
13:39
attributed to archaic homo sapiens have
13:41
been made by Homo Nolady the possibility
13:44
is real but without direct associations
13:46
between bones and tools unraveling who
13:49
made what remains a daunting challenge
13:52
still the mystery of Homo Nady pushes us
13:54
to rethink old assumptions it reminds us
13:57
that human evolution wasn't a straight
13:59
line it was a branching tangled story
14:02
filled with surprises and homon whether
14:05
ancient pioneer or resilient survivor
14:08
has become one of its most fascinating
14:10
chapters for many years the study of
14:12
human evolution has been largely shaped
14:14
by discoveries of early hominins like
14:17
Oralopythecus at wellestablished sites
14:20
such as Crumbry Sturk Fontine and
14:23
Schwart Crrons in the cradle of
14:25
humankind however the discovery of Homo
14:28
Nalady by Lee Burgerer marked an
14:30
exciting and groundbreaking shift in our
14:32
understanding he not only found an
14:34
important new source of evidence but
14:36
also overcame significant challenges in
14:38
extracting fossils from deep within the
14:40
rising star cave system the morphology
14:43
of Homo Nady is a unique blend of
14:45
primitive and derived traits making it
14:48
difficult to categorize while
14:50
researchers have analyzed different
14:51
regions of the skeleton separately a far
14:54
more complex task lies ahead combining
14:57
all the evidence to understand where
14:59
homoleti fits in the broader narrative
15:01
of human evolution the challenge will be
15:04
determining whether it makes sense to
15:05
keep homoleti within the genus homo
15:08
additionally the striking lack of
15:10
morphological variation among the
15:12
fossils of homo nady raises questions
15:15
about the diversity of this species
15:17
which will require further investigation
15:19
although Burgger and others argue that
15:21
the geological age of homon should not
15:24
directly affect its classification
15:26
understanding its age is crucial for
15:28
determining its relationship to other
15:30
hominins the age of homon is still
15:33
debated if it's between 1 and 2 million
15:36
years old it could provide valuable
15:38
insights into the evolutionary sequence
15:40
of traits in early humans helping
15:42
scientists understand how specific parts
15:45
of the skeleton evolved however if Homo
15:48
Nolidi is much younger between 300,000
15:51
and 200,000 years old it could represent
15:54
a local relic population that survived
15:56
much longer than expected preserving
15:59
features from much earlier stages of
16:01
human evolution in this case its unique
16:04
combination of traits could be a result
16:05
of genetic isolation rather than the
16:08
evolutionary trends seen in other
16:10
hominin species throughout human history
16:13
honoring the dead has been a deeply
16:15
meaningful cultural act from carefully
16:17
dug burial pits to symbolic rituals of
16:20
remembrance until recently such complex
16:23
behaviors including burials symbolic
16:25
engravings and the controlled use of
16:27
fire were believed to be unique to Homo
16:30
sapiens but the discovery of Homo Nolady
16:33
is challenging that long-held assumption
16:35
the Homo Noliti were located in
16:37
hard-to-reach chambers within the rising
16:39
star cave system there's also an ongoing
16:42
debate about how the bones got there
16:44
some scientists think the bodies were
16:46
not moved far within the cave while
16:48
others point out that certain patterns
16:49
of bone breakage suggest some kind of
16:51
movement occurred possibly through
16:53
another entrance that is no longer open
16:56
the possibility of natural deposition
16:58
through a now blocked entrance remains
17:00
open and more research is needed to
17:02
fully understand how these remarkable
17:04
fossils came to rest where they did in
17:07
short while it's tempting to think these
17:09
individuals were deliberately placed in
17:10
the dino lady chamber perhaps even by
17:13
other members of their species the
17:15
extraordinary placement raises a
17:17
profound question why would members of a
17:20
smallrained hominin species repeatedly
17:22
enter such a dangerous and pitch black
17:25
environment unless they had a meaningful
17:27
reason one compelling possibility
17:30
iserary caching the deliberate placement
17:33
of bodies or body parts in hidden remote
17:36
locations scientists argue that three
17:38
key conditions must be met to support
17:40
this idea evidence of artificial light
17:43
no signs of water-based transport and
17:46
the articulation of skeletal remains
17:48
meaning bones were still connected as
17:50
they would be in intact bodies burgger
17:52
and his team have proposed that Home
17:54
Lady might have used controlled fire to
17:56
illuminate the cave enabling them to
17:58
carry out these acts though the presence
18:01
of soot or charcoal would support this
18:03
such evidence remains elusive and the
18:06
idea of fire use remains speculative for
18:08
now the Rising Star Caves narrow
18:10
twisting passages and vertical fissures
18:13
make it unlikely that these bones simply
18:15
washed into the chamber in many cases
18:18
skeletal remains appear articulated
18:21
suggesting individuals were deposited
18:23
whole possibly placed with care some
18:25
researchers interpret sediment
18:27
disturbances in the area as signs of
18:29
deliberate burial though others argue
18:31
the differences in soil composition are
18:33
too minor to be conclusive moreover the
18:36
absence of clear grave outlines and the
18:38
presence of mixed remains from multiple
18:40
individuals complicate the burial theory
18:43
further debate surrounds what some
18:45
researchers describe as deliberate
18:47
engravings cross-hatch markings on a
18:49
stone pillar within the cave similar
18:52
marks however are known to occur
18:53
naturally from tectonic shifts in nearby
18:56
caves likewise a stone fragment found
18:59
near one skeleton was initially thought
19:01
to be a tool but others contend it's
19:03
simply a piece of limestone that fell
19:04
from the cave roof still the broader
19:07
context of the fines their location the
19:09
condition of the remains and the
19:11
possible use of fire points toward
19:13
intentional behavior if Homonoliti was
19:15
indeed engaging in some form of mortuary
19:18
practice it would represent one of the
19:20
earliest known examples of symbolic or
19:22
ritualized behavior in hominins this
19:25
challenges the assumption that such
19:26
cognitive abilities were exclusive to
19:28
large-brained humans and suggests that
19:31
emotional awareness social bonding and
19:33
cultural expression may have deeper
19:36
roots in our evolutionary past but how
19:38
do these behaviors fit within the
19:40
broader human family scientists propose
19:43
three possibilities perhaps homoniti
19:45
developed these behaviors independently
19:48
a case of parallel evolution or maybe
19:50
such practices go back even further
19:53
inherited from a shared ancestor in the
19:55
plyasene or early pleaene diverging
19:58
later between species a third
20:00
possibility is cultural exchange where
20:03
homonyiti and early homo sapiens living
20:06
in close proximity borrowed and shared
20:08
traditions across groups the emotional
20:11
dimension of these acts is hard to
20:13
ignore the repeated use of the same
20:15
burial space the engravings on nearby
20:17
stone walls all suggest shared beliefs
20:20
memory and social cohesion much like
20:24
Neanderthalss who left behind their own
20:26
marks of symbolic behavior Homo Nady may
20:29
have experienced a sense of community
20:32
loss and meaning and perhaps most
20:34
surprising of all is that Homo Nady had
20:37
a brain about onethird the size of ours
20:40
these discoveries defy the old
20:42
assumption that bigger brains mean more
20:44
complex culture instead they point to
20:47
something deeper a cultural and
20:49
empathetic niche where connection
20:52
cooperation and shared intention drove
20:54
innovation from crafting stone tools to
20:57
possibly mastering fire smallrained
21:00
hominins like Homo Nlei played a vital
21:03
role in shaping the human journey their
21:05
story reminds us that intelligence is
21:07
not measured by brain volume alone but
21:09
also by the capacity to care to create