0:08
individual sh14 lived in SEMA deus's
0:12
cave in Spain around 500,000 years ago
0:15
likely a homo H highle Bin's child aged
0:18
5 to 8 years displays early signs of
0:21
brain deformity the earliest such case
0:25
record remarkably despite cognitive
0:28
challenges this indiv idual received
0:30
care challenging many assumptions about
0:33
the origin of compassion in
0:37
prehistory compassion a vital human
0:40
emotion encompasses empathy love and
0:45
self-sacrifice rooted in hormonal and
0:47
neural processes it's not exclusive to
0:51
humans animals like dolphins and
0:54
primates display altruistic
0:56
behaviors however in humans compassion
0:59
goes beyond mere moments it involves
1:02
both feeling for others and being
1:05
them when we genuinely help others a
1:09
hormone called oxytocin is released into
1:11
our brains making us feel good the
1:15
evolution of compassion is rooted in the
1:17
way our hormones and neurons
1:19
work Evolution links compassionate
1:22
motivations to collaboration which is
1:25
crucial in environments with Predators
1:27
human compassion uniquely extends ends
1:32
term we can regulate compassion bringing
1:35
it into rational thought and planning
1:37
for the well-being of others it forms
1:40
the basis of close Human Social
1:42
relationships and acts as the glue that
1:46
together compassion in humans is diverse
1:50
reaching Beyond close relationships to
1:52
strangers animals and even abstract
1:55
Concepts we can care for and protect a
1:58
wide range of things from pets to
2:02
Justice one example of compassion and
2:04
Care in prehistory is a female hom orter
2:09
r808 dating back around 1.5 million
2:14
years she suffered from a disease called
2:18
hypervitaminosis which would have caused
2:21
symptoms despite the challenges she
2:24
survived long enough for the disease to
2:26
show in her skeletal remains experts
2:29
believe believe that someone else took
2:31
care of her providing food and
2:33
protection highlighting a form of mutual
2:35
support in early human
2:38
groups in Georgia's deines site there's
2:41
an old fossil of an early Homo erectus
2:45
1.77 million years old this person
2:49
represented by the skull D
2:51
3444 and Associated jaw
2:55
d3900 had lost all their teeth except
2:58
one this suggests they survive by eating
3:01
soft plant and animal Foods the question
3:04
is whether they got help from others to
3:08
diet comparing this to Apes tooth loss
3:11
has been seen in chimpanzees due to
3:13
injuries however the injuries in apes
3:16
are usually inflicted over time or
3:18
during their adult life what's
3:20
interesting about the deacey individual
3:22
is that they had congenital
3:24
abnormalities but did not survive into
3:27
adulthood this is different from apes
3:30
where severe congenital abnormalities
3:33
rare meanderthals whose paleontological
3:37
records display significant traumas and
3:39
potential impairments a well-known
3:42
example comes from the Neanderthals
3:44
specifically the old man of shanidar he
3:47
suffered multiple fractures and a head
3:49
injury causing blindness and brain
3:52
damage remarkably these injuries
3:55
occurred in adolescence but healed by
3:57
the time of his death around to 50 years
4:01
later this suggests that he received
4:04
long-term care from different
4:05
individuals within the Neanderthal
4:08
group many neanderthals and early humans
4:11
cared for their sick or injured members
4:14
studies show evidence of long-term care
4:17
dating back to around 190,000 to 160,000
4:22
ago in a sample of 19 Neanderthal
4:25
individuals researchers found that 60%
4:28
of those with traumatic injuries showed
4:32
healing additionally there was a low
4:34
rate of infection supporting the idea of
4:39
caregiving the healing times for these
4:41
injuries were estimated to be around 4
4:43
to 6 weeks suggesting a prolonged period
4:46
of needing care and support even after
4:49
healing individuals might have had
4:51
reduced abilities and required support
4:55
time this care was not limited to adults
4:58
there is evidence of care for
5:01
too one case involves a neanderthal
5:04
child who survived to at least 6 years
5:06
old despite having a severe inner ear
5:09
condition likely linked to Down
5:13
syndrome this condition would have
5:15
caused significant hearing loss and
5:17
balance issues the level of care needed
5:20
for such an individual would have been
5:22
beyond what a single caregiver could
5:24
provide implying that the child's
5:27
survival required help from other
5:29
members of the the social
5:31
group the study of the pathological
5:34
Neanderthal child from the Kenra site is
5:37
crucial for understanding the extent and
5:39
nature of social care among
5:43
neanderthals the kovra site in zativa
5:46
Spain is known for its fossil remains of
5:49
Neanderthals dating from 273,000 to
5:53
146,000 years ago recently new human
5:56
bone fragments were found from the site
5:58
belonging to an neanderthals inner
6:01
ear the features of the ear fragment
6:04
match those of Neanderthals and not
6:08
humans this Neanderthal fossil known as
6:12
46700 is estimated to be from an
6:14
individual who lived to be older than 6
6:17
years this estimation comes from
6:19
examining the development of a specific
6:22
inner ear bone which grows in a similar
6:24
pattern to Modern human
6:27
children the fossil shows several
6:30
problems with the inner ear one Canal is
6:32
unusually large and the bone structures
6:37
normal these issues suggest the child
6:40
had a condition that affects Hearing and
6:42
Balance the child likely experienced
6:44
severe hearing loss and frequent
6:48
dizziness the only syndrome that fits
6:50
all the abnormalities found in cn4
6:54
670000 is Down syndrome Down syndrome
6:57
often includes inner ear issues similar
7:02
6700 such as changes in the inner ear
7:04
structures in smaller
7:07
cockle Down syndrome is a common genetic
7:10
disorder that affects various aspects of
7:12
development including physical and
7:16
growth children with Down Syndrome
7:19
typically experience delays in physical
7:21
development such as walking and talking
7:24
and may have problems with muscle tone
7:28
skills they they might also face
7:30
challenges with feeding and balance due
7:33
to these issues children with Down
7:35
Syndrome often develop more slowly
7:37
compared to their peers and might face
7:39
significant developmental
7:42
delays there was a case of a chimpanzee
7:45
with Down Syndrome that lived a 23
7:48
months old thanks to its mother's care
7:51
and the help of her eldest
7:53
daughter when the daughter stopped
7:55
helping the mother couldn't manage on
7:57
her own and the chimpanzee died
8:01
historical records show that children
8:03
with Down Syndrome from ancient times
8:08
3,629 bcee rarely lived Beyond 16 months
8:13
this highlights how short their life
8:17
past the kova Negra child fossil is
8:20
remarkable because it shows an
8:22
individual with Down Syndrome who live
8:24
to at least 6 years old which is much
8:27
longer than usual for prehistoric time
8:30
this suggests that this individual
8:34
care today children with Down Syndrome
8:37
survive much longer due to medical and
8:41
advances in 1929 their average life
8:44
expectancy was 9 years by the 1940s it
8:48
had increased to 12 years and now it
8:50
often exceeds 60 years in developed
8:54
countries the long survival of the
8:57
individual suggests that Neanderthals
8:59
like early humans had complex social
9:04
systems it's likely that other members
9:06
of their group helped care for
9:08
individuals with disabilities especially
9:11
given the demanding lifestyle of
9:14
Neanderthals there are other fossil
9:17
cases with inner ear pathologies but
9:19
these involved adults with acquired
9:22
conditions not congenital ones like kova
9:26
child the case of kovra child is unique
9:29
because it shows evidence of long-term
9:31
caregiving for an immature individual
9:34
who couldn't reciprocate the
9:37
care the evidence from koven Negra child
9:40
fossil supports the idea that
9:42
neanderthals like early humans engaged
9:45
in collaborative parenting and
9:48
caregiving this suggests that complex
9:51
social behaviors and support systems
9:53
were part of their lives reflecting a
9:55
deep rooted social adaptation that has
9:57
been present for a long time in the
10:00
homo early modern humans from the upper
10:04
Paleolithic period also exhibited cases
10:06
of extensive care for individuals with
10:10
disabilities for example Rito 2 a child
10:13
from late upper Paleolithic Italy had a
10:16
severe disability and was cared for by
10:18
the entire group until their death at
10:24
old some individuals with physical
10:26
abnormalities including children were
10:29
given given special attention and
10:30
elaborate grave Goods indicating care
10:33
and respect for their well-being even
10:36
newborns were buried suggesting care
10:38
extended to those who hadn't actively
10:41
contributed to the group
10:42
yet this evidence highlights the
10:45
compassionate nature of our ancient
10:48
ancestors early humans showed signs of
10:51
caring for others in diverse ways one
10:54
way was by being willing to take risks
10:56
or endure pain to help someone else
11:00
this shows compassion not just towards
11:02
those who are sick but in situations
11:04
where there's a potential
11:06
danger in the past when humans had to
11:09
compete with Predators for food or hunt
11:12
large animals it was
11:14
risky however evidence suggests that
11:17
they were successful because they worked
11:18
together and took risks for the group's
11:21
benefit as early as 1.8 million years
11:25
ago our ancestors Homo erectus had
11:28
larger bodies and took longer to grow up
11:31
this is believed to be because they
11:33
collaborated in Scavenging for meat and
11:36
taking care of pregnant females and
11:38
ones they showed a sense of care for
11:42
other around 500,000 years ago at box
11:47
grve there's evidence that early humans
11:49
were consciously taking risks in hunting
11:51
large animals they used weapons and
11:54
planned for hunting even though it was
11:57
dangerous this suggests a high level of
12:00
trust among the group
12:03
members moving forward to the time of
12:05
Neanderthals about 112 143,000 years ago
12:10
there's evidence that they planned and
12:12
showed care for each other they
12:14
organized hunts and many of them
12:18
injuries in terms of emotions evidence
12:22
from burial suggest they shared
12:25
grief for example at seima De lausus in
12:28
Spain the deliberate placement of bones
12:31
in a pit indicates a shared expression
12:35
grief later with more formal burials
12:38
like at tabun in the near East around
12:40
112 to 143,000 years ago it shows that
12:45
even in death they cared for their
12:47
fellow humans although it's not clear if
12:50
they believed in an afterlife the act of
12:52
burying their dead suggests a shared
12:55
connection animals including non-human
12:59
primates like chimpanzees usually show
13:02
altruism by helping Ken or those who can
13:05
return however humans often help
13:08
strangers without any immediate benefit
13:11
themselves some studies suggest that
13:13
chimpanzees might be more altruistic
13:15
than we thought like rescuing others
13:17
from drowning or adopting unrelated
13:21
orphans chimpanzees though seem to
13:24
struggle with altruism in competitive
13:26
situations or when sharing food
13:29
especially meat for humans helping
13:31
others especially the young ones became
13:34
crucial due to our unique life
13:37
history humans have a longer period of
13:40
dependency after weaning and we depend
13:43
on the support of the group not just the
13:45
mother this makes humans Cooperative
13:50
breeders the shift to this Cooperative
13:52
breeding pattern happened as early
13:54
humans started consuming more meat
13:57
however the fossil evidence shows that
13:59
early homo and lower Pline Homo rectus
14:02
developed more rapidly than modern
14:05
humans some middle plene hominins like
14:09
the sale and sh14 specimens might have
14:12
already had a human like life history
14:15
but later neander Hol still showed
14:19
development the difference between apes
14:21
and early humans might not be as big as
14:23
we think instead of seeing ancient human
14:26
altruism as proof of moral values
14:29
it's better to consider it as part of
14:31
the adaptations that made humans
14:35
prolific in our evolutionary past
14:38
compassion was a social Advantage
14:41
collaborative efforts in helping others
14:43
offered benefits contradicting the
14:45
selfish Gene concept being kind had
14:48
advantages in certain social
14:49
environments challenging the idea of
14:54
Behavior A Brief Review of the
14:56
archaeological evidence for emotional
14:58
investment in the well-being of others
15:00
allows us to propose four key levels of
15:05
compassion in stage one from around 6 to
15:08
1.8 million years ago early humans
15:11
likely showed basic compassion this
15:14
would have included simple actions like
15:16
comforting someone in distress or
15:18
helping with immediate problems such as
15:21
moving obstacles from someone's
15:24
path early species like Homo habilis and
15:29
may have started working together to
15:31
hunt and defend against predators
15:33
suggesting that collaboration was
15:37
survival in stage two from about 1.8
15:41
million years ago compassion began to
15:43
evolve into a more complex emotion
15:45
linked with rational thought early
15:48
humans like Homo erectus and Homo H
15:50
highle bensis started sharing meat with
15:53
others including pregnant females and
15:57
infants helpers such as older siblings
15:59
and grandmothers played a role in caring
16:02
for The Young and the
16:04
ill by around 400,000 years ago evidence
16:08
of rituals and burial practices
16:10
indicates that emotions like compassion
16:12
and grief were beginning to be expressed
16:14
and understood suggesting the early
16:17
forms of love and social emotions like
16:20
shame in stage three between 300,000 and
16:24
50,000 years ago neanderthals in Europe
16:27
demonstrated a deeper level of of
16:29
compassion they showed long-term care
16:31
for injured or ill individuals which
16:34
likely involved the whole
16:37
group this period revealed signs of
16:39
sophisticated emotional responses such
16:42
as empathy remorse and
16:45
shame neanderthals had complex social
16:49
interactions and communication which
16:51
included the ability to express and
16:53
understand emotions though their social
16:55
structure was different from modern
16:59
in modern humans from about 120,000
17:03
years ago in Africa and 40,000 years ago
17:06
in Europe compassion expanded to include
17:09
strangers animals and Abstract
17:13
Concepts humans began to care for
17:16
objects and symbols and developed
17:18
complex social networks that allowed for
17:21
broader and more flexible compassionate
17:25
responses this new ability to connect
17:27
and communicate AC across large areas
17:30
led to the protection of both people and
17:32
objects illustrating the sophisticated
17:37
compassion in summary compassion in
17:40
humans evolved from simple acts of help
17:42
in early species to complex emotional
17:45
and social structures in modern humans
17:47
deeply embedded in our social
17:49
interactions and cultural
17:52
practices the study of prehistoric
17:54
compassion is still in its early stages
17:56
and remains exploratory
18:00
archaeological findings on the care of
18:02
the ill collaboration shared emotions
18:06
and the ability to extend care beyond
18:08
immediate relationships in ancient
18:10
humans as well as evidence of altruism
18:13
in great apes are beginning to make
18:15
these once abstract concepts of
18:18
feelings in ancient humans more tangible
18:24
explainable while our approach is
18:27
scientific understanding the devel
18:28
velopment of compassion in early humans
18:30
reveals a significant and potentially
18:32
moving aspect of their lives