Uncover the mystery of Göbekli Tepe, the world's oldest known monumental structure, built around 9700 BCE—thousands of years before Stonehenge, farming, or writing. Located in southeastern Turkey, this extraordinary site of colossal T-shaped stone pillars reshaped our understanding of early human history.
This video explores how small groups of hunter-gatherers in the Fertile Crescent created elaborate symbolic systems, paving the way for organized spiritual life and the rise of culture. We journey into Enclosure D to decode the powerful carvings of animals (foxes, snakes, vultures) and abstract symbols that served as emblems for early clans and celebrated the "fox master" ancestors.
Learn how Göbekli Tepe was not a village, but a sacred gathering place and a center for exchange—a "proto-civilization" that bound communities through shared rituals and massive feasts. Discover the interconnected sites of Jerf el Ahmar and Tell Qaramel that formed the cultural horizon culminating at Göbekli Tepe.
Finally, we examine the site's eventual decline, tracing how the very systems of ritual and monumental labor that united people became too demanding to sustain, leading to a cultural collapse that nonetheless laid the foundation for the Neolithic Revolution and the future of human society.
Keywords: Göbekli Tepe, Neolithic, Ancient History, Archaeology, World's Oldest Temple, Fertile Crescent, Hunter-Gatherers, Monumental Architecture, Şanlıurfa.
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:04
As the upper Paleolithic age slowly gave
0:06
way to the Mesolithic and early
0:08
Neolithic, small groups of hunters and
0:11
traveling crafts people began to form
0:13
larger, more stable communities. Groups
0:16
we might now think of as early tribes or
0:19
clans in the highlands of southeastern
0:21
Turkey and the northern fertile crescent
0:24
along the Tigris and Euphrates rivers.
0:26
these early societies started to take
0:29
shape. It was in this landscape of rocky
0:32
plains and fertile valleys that humans
0:35
first began to create symbolic systems,
0:38
ways of expressing meaning, identity,
0:41
and belief through art and design.
0:44
Around 10,000 B.CE, CE. Several sites
0:48
appeared across this region, filled with
0:50
carvings and symbols that mark the
0:53
earliest evidence of organized spiritual
0:55
life, the beginnings of what we might
0:57
now call culture. Among all these
1:00
places, one stood out. On a limestone
1:03
hilltop about 15 km northeast of modern
1:06
Shanurfa, a group of hunter gatherers
1:08
chose a barren and windy plateau to
1:11
build something extraordinary. They
1:13
began quarrying and shaping huge stone
1:16
pillars, some taller than a person,
1:18
others so heavy that it would take many
1:21
people to move them. These T-shaped
1:23
monoliths were arranged in great
1:25
circular enclosures.
1:28
Skilled craftseople, flint workers,
1:30
stone carvers, and tool makers traveled
1:33
from distant places to take part.
1:36
Even though the site was too harsh for
1:38
farming or living, it became a center
1:40
for gathering and exchange where people
1:43
shared tools, ideas, and artistic
1:46
techniques.
1:48
Inside these circles of stone, humans
1:50
and animals were carved side by side
1:53
with abstract shapes, creating a new
1:56
visual language that expressed how early
1:58
people saw themselves and the world
2:00
around them. This was Gobeclete, meaning
2:04
the belly hill or naval hill of Turkey.
2:07
What shocked archaeologists most was how
2:10
complete and sophisticated the site's
2:12
oldest enclosure was from the start.
2:15
Unlike later monuments such as
2:17
Stonehenge, which evolved over
2:19
generations, Gobeclete's enclosure D was
2:23
finished as a unified complex design.
2:26
12 enormous pillars, some over 5 m tall,
2:30
were carefully positioned in a perfect
2:33
circle, facing inward like the spokes of
2:35
a wheel. Radiocarbon dating showed it
2:38
was built around 9,700
2:41
B.CE, making it the oldest known
2:44
monumental structure in the world, built
2:46
long before farming, metal, or writing
2:49
existed. Strangely, the later enclosures
2:52
were smaller and less refined, as if the
2:55
art and craftsmanship had declined over
2:58
time, an unexpected reversal of what we
3:01
usually see in ancient architecture. To
3:04
understand how such a remarkable site
3:06
came to be, we have to look at other
3:08
nearby communities from the same period.
3:11
About 90 km southwest along the
3:14
Euphrates River, the settlement of Jerel
3:16
Armar was being built. There, people
3:19
were beginning to settle down rather
3:21
than move constantly.
3:23
In the center of that village stood a
3:25
large round mudbrick building, three
3:27
times bigger than any nearby home.
3:31
Inside it was divided into small
3:33
compartments with wooden pillars and
3:35
walls decorated with patterns that
3:37
looked like woven textiles.
3:40
Nearby, orac wild cattle skulls were
3:43
built into the walls, hinting at early
3:45
ritual practices. The repeating zigzag
3:48
lines and animal symbols at Yer Fel Amma
3:52
would later appear again refined and
3:55
magnified in the carvings of Gobeclete.
4:01
Further north at Tel Caramel,
4:04
archaeologists discovered another early
4:05
communal complex. Huge stone towers 6 m
4:10
wide were built with crescent-shaped
4:12
benches and hearths that burned for
4:14
centuries.
4:16
These fires weren't just for warmth.
4:18
They were part of ritual gatherings
4:20
showing that fire had sacred meaning in
4:22
community life. Even hundreds of
4:24
kilometers away in Wadi Fenan, southern
4:27
Jordan, similar semi-ubteran buildings
4:30
appeared. Their snake- like lines,
4:33
massive stone mortars, and decorated
4:36
tools suggest that feasting, craft work,
4:39
and ceremony were deeply connected, and
4:43
that these early people were part of
4:45
wider networks of exchange, not isolated
4:48
groups. All of this evidence points to
4:51
one clear truth. Gobecée did not appear
4:55
out of nowhere. It was the peak of a
4:58
cultural evolution that had been
4:59
unfolding across the fertile crescent
5:01
for centuries. Its beauty, scale, and
5:05
symbolic depth reflect the creativity of
5:07
people living through a time of great
5:10
environmental change. The younger Dryus,
5:13
a sudden cold and dry period that
5:16
reshaped how humans lived. These people
5:19
weren't simply struggling to survive.
5:21
They were finding new ways to come
5:23
together, to create meaning, to express
5:26
shared beliefs, and to build spaces that
5:29
bound them as communities.
5:31
In this light, Gobeclete was never a
5:34
village. It was a gathering place, a
5:37
sacred meeting ground where early humans
5:40
came to celebrate, to remember, and to
5:43
connect. Its pillars, carvings, and
5:46
circles were not homes, but symbols. A
5:49
declaration that humans could shape both
5:52
the physical world and the world of
5:54
ideas. Here, for the first time in
5:57
history, people turned stone into story,
6:01
turning belief itself into architecture.
6:04
Imagine, if you will, being granted the
6:07
extraordinary privilege of stepping
6:09
freely among the enclosures of
6:11
Gobeclete.
6:13
We descend cautiously down a ladder,
6:15
then another, until our feet touch the
6:17
floor of enclosure D, the earliest and
6:19
most elaborately decorated of these
6:21
sanctuaries. Sunlight slants across the
6:24
limestone, revealing every incision,
6:27
every curve, every shadowed relief.
6:30
Animals, abstract symbols, and towering
6:33
anthropomorphic pillars emerge in the
6:36
shifting light. Their presence both
6:38
haunting and commanding. At the heart of
6:41
this egg-shaped space lies two
6:44
monumental teaars, its unmistakable
6:46
focal points. But our exploration begins
6:49
at the edge. Pillar 22 stands before us,
6:53
abstractly human, featureless, yet
6:55
unmistakably corporeal. A snake and a
6:59
fox ripple across its face in delicate
7:01
relief. Moving clockwise, pillar 21
7:05
presents a gazelle, a wild ass, and a
7:07
creature we cannot readily name. On
7:10
pillar 20, wild cattle, a leaping fox,
7:13
and a lizard appear. Each line carved
7:16
with studded intent. Pillars 26 and 28
7:20
displays poised along their inward
7:22
edges, frozen in motion, yet alive
7:25
within the stone. The animals here are
7:28
not domesticated. They are the quarry of
7:31
hunters. Boars, foxes, gazels, ducks,
7:35
creatures of the chase speak to a people
7:37
deeply bound to the rhythms of the hunt.
7:41
Tens of thousands of fractured and
7:43
marked bones unearthed from the site
7:46
attest to communal feasts and ritual
7:48
gatherings centered on this primal act.
7:51
Yet among these familiar forms appear
7:54
more dangerous beings, snakes,
7:57
scorpions, spiders. Their presence
8:00
gestures toward a realm beyond
8:02
sustenance, toward myth, danger, and the
8:05
sacred. At the southwestern edge, pillar
8:08
33 commands attention. Cranes march
8:11
across its capstone, their long necks
8:14
carved with fluid precision. At the
8:17
base, the enigmatic H symbol appears,
8:20
neither letter nor ornament, but a
8:22
deliberate sign whose meaning is now
8:25
lost. around it. Serpents coil and
8:28
weave, guiding the eye along the narrow
8:31
edge, while a six-legged spider asserts
8:33
itself within this ritual tableau.
8:36
Then rises pillar 43, the famed vulture
8:40
stone, the zenith of symbolic
8:43
expression. A goose-like bird supports a
8:46
headless phallic human figure. A
8:49
scorpion crouches below. Serpents,
8:52
cranes, bors, and geometric motifs
8:55
interlace the surface in a dense
8:57
choreography of meaning. Every relief
8:59
feels purposeful, every form a fragment
9:02
of an ancient cosmology rendered in
9:04
stone. At the center stand the two
9:07
tallest pillars, 18 and 31, like
9:11
sentinels presiding over the circle.
9:14
Carved arms run down their narrow edges,
9:17
confirming their human essence. Pillar
9:20
31 bears a necklace formed from a
9:22
buchranium and a belt adorned with
9:24
crescents and H symbols. Pillar 18 wears
9:28
an even richer ensemble, an H symbol
9:31
pendant, a circumpunct, a crescent, and
9:34
a belt clasped with intertwined
9:36
serpents. Fox pelts hang from their
9:39
waists, and living foxes are etched in
9:42
the crooks of their arms. These
9:44
adornments speak of mythic beings or
9:47
divine intermediaries, figures of power
9:50
and reverence. Across enclosure D,
9:53
snakes dominate, 25 in total, followed
9:56
by foxes, ducks, cranes, and oroxs.
10:00
Bors, wild sheep, asiatic asses, gazels,
10:04
vultures, geese, scorpions, spiders, and
10:07
great cats complete the menagerie.
10:10
Alongside them, abstract signs, the H
10:13
symbol, circumunct and crescent, compose
10:16
a separate pictorial language, one
10:19
silent now, yet unmistakably deliberate,
10:22
carrying meanings that once bound a
10:24
people, their rituals, and their gods.
10:27
Walking among these teaars feels like
10:30
turning the pages of a stone picture
10:31
book. Each carving tells a story about
10:34
the beliefs and imagination of a society
10:37
standing at the very beginning of the
10:39
Neolithic age. The size of these stones,
10:42
their carving, transport, and careful
10:45
placement reveals something
10:46
extraordinary. People were working
10:49
together on a scale that shows a new
10:51
kind of shared purpose. Here in this
10:55
limestone sanctuary, the minds of hunter
10:58
gatherers began to change. ritual,
11:01
community, myth, and art came together
11:03
to form a new way of seeing the world
11:06
and themselves. Though these pillars
11:09
were later buried, they still speak
11:11
clearly across 11,000 years. Their
11:14
carvings remain sharp, their forms bold,
11:17
their arrangement precise. Gobecé feels
11:20
almost modern in its vision. It is not
11:23
just an ancient site. It is a threshold
11:26
into deep time, a place where we can
11:29
sense the birth of culture and belief
11:32
long before cities, writing or organized
11:35
religion. These carvings record how
11:38
humans began to see themselves as part
11:40
of something larger. How they used stone
11:43
to carry their identity, history, and
11:46
shared life forward through time.
11:50
At the heart of the grandest enclosure
11:52
stands Pillar 18, a massive T-shaped
11:55
figure. It's easy to think of it as a
11:57
god, but its meaning may be more human
12:00
and closer to home. Look at the fox held
12:03
in the crook of its arm. Thousands of
12:06
years before Gobeclete, a grave in
12:09
Jordan revealed a person buried with a
12:11
fox companion. Taming a wild fox
12:14
required great patience and skill,
12:17
qualities deeply respected among hunter
12:19
gatherers. Over generations, the memory
12:22
of such a person could have grown into
12:24
legend. The foxmaster might have become
12:27
an honored ancestor, a figure remembered
12:30
not as divine, but as a model of human
12:34
excellence.
12:35
In this light, the great teapillars may
12:38
not have been gods at all, but
12:40
ancestors, human figures raised to
12:43
monumental scale. Building them was a
12:46
tribute to those who came before, to the
12:48
founders of their world. The symbols
12:51
carved on these stone ancestors were not
12:53
decorations, but signs of identity, a
12:57
kind of early emblem for clans or
12:59
groups. On pillar 18, the belt tells
13:03
such a story. Snakes twist across many
13:06
pillars, not just for their shape, but
13:09
for their motion. A snake's winding
13:12
movement echoed the path of a thread
13:14
passing through a loom. Weaving, a vital
13:18
new skill, allowed people to make nets,
13:20
baskets, and cloth. It was a craft that
13:24
bound their lives together. One pillar
13:27
even shows a carved net pattern held by
13:30
weights shaped like snake heads. The H
13:33
symbol seen on pillar 18's belt may come
13:36
from this same idea. Two snake heads
13:39
joined together. It could have meant
13:42
alliance, a sign that two great weaving
13:45
families had united. Other symbols point
13:48
to different parts of life. The C-shaped
13:51
mark might have been a trader sign.
13:53
Similar shapes appear on stone stamps
13:56
found far from Gbeclete, perhaps marking
13:59
goods like obsidian or fine stone tools.
14:03
The round circumunct symbol, like a
14:05
circle with a dot in the middle,
14:07
probably stood for something central to
14:09
their way of life, feasting.
14:12
Archaeologists have uncovered huge stone
14:14
troughs that could hold over 150 L along
14:18
with circular stone plates. These
14:21
weren't for everyday meals, but for
14:23
great gatherings filled with food and
14:25
drink, beer or wine brewed for
14:28
celebration. Such feasts built
14:31
friendships and shared identity, and the
14:34
symbol of a bowl or plate may have
14:36
represented that bond of abundance.
14:39
We can imagine people arriving from
14:41
nearby valleys and distant hills,
14:44
gathering beneath the gaze of their
14:46
stone ancestors. The pillars wore the
14:49
signs of their world. The weaver's
14:51
snake, the trader's mark, the feasters's
14:54
bowl, the chief's fox. Here they came to
14:58
celebrate, to tell stories, to honor
15:01
those who shaped their lives. Under the
15:04
watchful eyes of the teaillars, they
15:05
feasted and remembered. The stories they
15:09
told were not just myths. They were
15:11
their history, carved forever into
15:14
stone. Since Gobec Leepe was first
15:16
revealed to the world in the early
15:18
2000s, a powerful story has taken hold
15:22
in the public imagination.
15:24
Across news articles, documentaries, and
15:27
the endless echo of the internet, the
15:29
site is often summed up in a single
15:31
phrase, the world's oldest temple. It's
15:35
an idea that's easy to picture. A sacred
15:37
place where wandering stone age people
15:39
gathered from far and wide to worship,
15:42
make offerings, and hold ceremonies
15:44
beneath giant T-shaped pillars rising
15:47
above the open landscape.
15:50
This idea makes sense at first glance.
15:53
There are no signs of ordinary daily
15:55
life at the site. No hearths where fires
15:58
once burned, no ovens for baking bread,
16:01
no pens for animals or fields for crops.
16:05
The huge stone pillars could never have
16:07
supported normal roofs. Their carved
16:10
surfaces covered with animals and
16:11
strange symbols seem to serve no
16:14
practical purpose. The site's remote
16:17
setting, far from water and farmland,
16:19
makes it feel like a special place, a
16:22
space set apart from everyday life.
16:25
But the story of Gobeclete is not as
16:27
simple as calling it a temple. The site
16:30
suggests a much richer picture. The
16:33
teaars arranged in oval enclosures may
16:36
have once supported light roofs. Stone
16:39
basins, troughs, and channels carved
16:41
into the bedrock hint that water storage
16:44
and plant use were part of the site's
16:46
rhythm. Tools such as sickle blades
16:48
suggest nearby farming or food
16:50
processing. The enormous effort needed
16:53
to raise these stones points to
16:54
cooperation and shared purpose. The
16:58
animal carvings also tell a deeper
17:00
story. The foxes, cranes, vultures,
17:04
snakes, and bo were likely not random
17:07
decorations, but represented different
17:09
social groups or clans acting as emblems
17:13
or totems. These carvings may have been
17:15
a symbolic language helping people
17:17
identify who they were and what they
17:20
belonged to.
17:21
Take for example the famous vulture
17:23
stone in enclosure D. The images on this
17:26
pillar seem to tell a story perhaps
17:29
about three major families or lineages
17:32
each symbolized by its own animal. The
17:35
bird, the fox, the scorpion, and other
17:38
figures are part of a social and
17:39
mythological story about alliances,
17:42
heritage, and power. In these carvings,
17:45
everyday life and myth merge, showing a
17:48
culture where nature, memory, and
17:50
identity were deeply connected. Perhaps
17:53
before these stone enclosures were
17:55
built, there were earlier wooden
17:57
versions. In those structures, people
17:59
may have imagined a great bird or totem
18:02
that united their communities. Through
18:05
drumming, dancing, and singing, they
18:07
could have brought the carvings to life,
18:09
giving power to the stone animals. The
18:13
enclosures layout may reflect this
18:15
social organization.
18:17
In the earliest enclosure, the tallest
18:19
pillars rise at the center, decorated
18:22
with foxes, ducks, and abstract symbols,
18:26
signaling the gathering of multiple
18:27
groups. Around them, shorter pillars
18:30
display snakes, wild cattle, gazels, and
18:33
other motifs. Building the enclosures
18:36
demanded organization, likely giving
18:39
rise to hierarchies based on expertise
18:42
and resources. The enclosures were not
18:44
only places of monumental labor, but
18:47
also sites of knowledge exchange, craft
18:50
production, and learning, much like
18:52
temples or marketplaces in later
18:54
societies. The site's location at the
18:57
crossroads of ancient roots across
18:59
southeastern Turkey and northwest Syria
19:02
amplified these interactions. bands,
19:05
clans, herders, and traders could stop
19:08
here, exchanging ideas, goods, and
19:11
expertise.
19:12
Over millennia, this interaction may
19:14
have fostered the need for permanent
19:16
clan houses enclosed by the Teaillars.
19:20
Shamans remained influential, but their
19:22
solitary authority was being
19:24
supplemented and eventually overtaken by
19:27
an emergent elite. This elite combined
19:31
craft, trade, administration, and
19:34
symbolic power, leveraging knowledge of
19:36
weaving and stonework to consolidate
19:39
wealth and influence.
19:42
The monumental work was as much a
19:44
statement of social cohesion and
19:46
technical mastery as it was of ritual
19:48
importance.
19:50
Over generations, this symbolic system
19:52
spread to neighboring sites such as Nali
19:55
Chry, Hamzantepe, and Kurtik.
19:59
At Nali Chi, sculptures of large birds
20:02
and human-faced birds continued the
20:04
visual language of Gobeclete, but in
20:07
forms suited to domestic or small-cale
20:10
contexts. Stone vessels such as those
20:13
from Kurtepe carried the same symbolic
20:16
repertoire. Intricate zigzags, meanders,
20:19
and lozenes, often combined with animal
20:22
imagery, became markers of prestige and
20:25
identity. These portable symbols enabled
20:28
the dissemination of craft religion
20:30
practices and served as a form of
20:33
advertisement for the clan houses,
20:36
attracting collaborators and allies to
20:38
the growing network.
20:40
By the late 10th and early 9th millennia
20:43
B.C.E., The ideas and social connections
20:46
from Gobec Leeppe had grown into a
20:48
broader culture that spread across
20:50
nearby settlements known as the Shanlurf
20:54
cultural horizon. The symbols evolved
20:57
into new patterns, grids, parallel
21:00
lines, and Vshapes like those on the
21:02
Uran statue. With his calm face, tall
21:06
body, and double V necklace, Ferman
21:09
represents the power and status of the
21:11
early elite. people skilled in craft,
21:14
trade, and ritual whose obsidian eyes
21:17
attest to the far-reaching trade
21:19
networks that supported their influence.
21:22
These networks were practical and
21:24
economic. Obsidian from central
21:26
Anatolia, fine tools, and other special
21:29
goods moved between settlements, helping
21:31
local leaders strengthen their
21:33
authority. Communal buildings allowed
21:36
people to gather for ceremonies and
21:38
decision-making, connecting communities
21:40
through shared beliefs, trade, and
21:42
traditions. By around 7,000 B.CE, as
21:46
Gobeclete's last enclosures were built,
21:49
the huntergatherer way of life had
21:51
climaxed. The social, artistic, and
21:54
trade systems developed here laid the
21:57
foundation for the Neolithic Revolution,
21:59
leading to permanent villages, farming,
22:01
and hering. This change also brought new
22:05
problems. The very systems of monuments,
22:08
rituals, and organized labor that united
22:10
people eventually became too demanding
22:13
to sustain. During this time, people
22:15
relied mostly on hunting and hering,
22:18
farming remained experimental.
22:21
This raises a question. If hunting
22:23
provided enough food, why turn to the
22:26
harder work of farming? The answer lies
22:28
in social and symbolic pressures.
22:31
building communal sanctuaries and
22:34
performing shared rituals required
22:36
stability and cooperation. These
22:38
cultural forces encouraged people to
22:40
settle and cultivate food not just for
22:43
survival but to support their growing
22:46
social world. Environmental changes also
22:49
played a part. The younger dus, a
22:52
colder, drier climate made wild cereals
22:55
and animals scarcer, pushing some groups
22:58
to experiment with planting and animal
23:00
domestication.
23:02
While climate alone did not cause
23:04
agriculture, it was a spark that
23:06
combined with human creativity and
23:09
social needs gradually turned farming
23:12
into a way of life. A striking theme of
23:15
this period is the division of labor.
23:18
Women carried much of early agricultures
23:20
burden, grinding grain, weaving, basket
23:24
making, and child care. These tasks
23:27
caused physical strain, bone
23:29
deformities, and shorter lifespans
23:32
compared to men. Men faced dangers in
23:35
hunting and hering, but their work was
23:38
less constant.
23:40
This shows that agriculture, while
23:42
bringing stability, had great social and
23:44
physical costs, especially for women.
23:47
Ritual and religion were closely tied to
23:50
power. The skull building at Taionu with
23:53
its human remains and traces of blood
23:55
suggests rituals included offerings or
23:58
sacrifices. Such acts may have helped
24:00
elites claim divine authority, control
24:03
labor, and manage community tensions.
24:07
Wealth and specialized crafts
24:08
concentrated in the hands of marking the
24:11
rise of early class divisions. The shift
24:14
to farming improved the food supply, but
24:16
also increased hardship. People worked
24:19
harder, families grew larger, and
24:22
diseases spread more easily. Monumental
24:25
projects and ritual duties added to the
24:27
workload. Over time, the cultural
24:30
benefits of Gobeclete's tradition were
24:32
likely outweighed by the physical and
24:35
social costs of sustaining it. The
24:37
Shanlufa Chayion culture peaked through
24:39
symbols, crafts, and monumental
24:42
architecture, uniting people under a
24:44
serpentine theocracy. A system led by
24:47
elites using serpent imagery to maintain
24:50
power. Gobecé acted as a center for
24:54
artisans, traders, and ritual
24:56
specialists. A protoivilization lasting
24:59
over two millennia. Yet, its success
25:02
carried the seeds of decline. As farming
25:05
and settled life became common, people's
25:07
focus shifted. Resources once devoted to
25:10
great monuments faded, weakening the old
25:13
system. Time itself was perceived
25:16
differently. As people built, harvested,
25:19
and settled year after year, they
25:22
developed a stronger linear sense of
25:24
past and future, replacing the cyclical
25:27
rhythm of hunter gatherer life. Later,
25:30
smaller, simpler sanctuaries reflect not
25:32
only fewer resources, but also a loss of
25:35
collective faith in the old religious
25:38
order. Simultaneously, a folk religion
25:41
emerged in homes represented by small
25:44
male and female figurines. These humble
25:47
symbols expressed everyday spirituality,
25:50
challenging the elitees control. As the
25:53
monumental cult lost its grip, tension
25:55
and resistance grew. This unrest reached
25:59
a breaking point. A carving of a woman
26:01
giving birth may have become a powerful
26:04
symbol of renewal and protest. Across
26:07
the region, monuments were torn down,
26:10
statues defaced, and sacred symbols
26:13
destroyed. The great buildings of Sionu,
26:16
including the skull building, were
26:18
burned or dismantled as the people
26:20
turned against the system that once
26:22
bound them. The collapse of the
26:24
Shanlurfa Tayionu culture ended its
26:27
monumental power, but not its legacy.
26:30
The ideas it created, symbolic thinking,
26:33
organized ritual, social hierarchy, and
26:36
a new awareness of time shaped all that
26:39
followed. Even as the temples fell, the
26:41
ways of thinking they inspired survived.
26:44
This collapse was not an end, but a
26:47
transformation, a step toward new forms
26:50
of community and self-standing that
26:52
would define subsequent human history.
26:57
[Music]

