0:04
As the upper Paleolithic age slowly gave
0:06
way to the Mesolithic and early
0:08
Neolithic, small groups of hunters and
0:11
traveling crafts people began to form
0:13
larger, more stable communities. Groups
0:16
we might now think of as early tribes or
0:19
clans in the highlands of southeastern
0:21
Turkey and the northern fertile crescent
0:24
along the Tigris and Euphrates rivers.
0:26
these early societies started to take
0:29
shape. It was in this landscape of rocky
0:32
plains and fertile valleys that humans
0:35
first began to create symbolic systems,
0:38
ways of expressing meaning, identity,
0:41
and belief through art and design.
0:44
Around 10,000 B.CE, CE. Several sites
0:48
appeared across this region, filled with
0:50
carvings and symbols that mark the
0:53
earliest evidence of organized spiritual
0:55
life, the beginnings of what we might
0:57
now call culture. Among all these
1:00
places, one stood out. On a limestone
1:03
hilltop about 15 km northeast of modern
1:06
Shanurfa, a group of hunter gatherers
1:08
chose a barren and windy plateau to
1:11
build something extraordinary. They
1:13
began quarrying and shaping huge stone
1:16
pillars, some taller than a person,
1:18
others so heavy that it would take many
1:21
people to move them. These T-shaped
1:23
monoliths were arranged in great
1:28
Skilled craftseople, flint workers,
1:30
stone carvers, and tool makers traveled
1:33
from distant places to take part.
1:36
Even though the site was too harsh for
1:38
farming or living, it became a center
1:40
for gathering and exchange where people
1:43
shared tools, ideas, and artistic
1:48
Inside these circles of stone, humans
1:50
and animals were carved side by side
1:53
with abstract shapes, creating a new
1:56
visual language that expressed how early
1:58
people saw themselves and the world
2:00
around them. This was Gobeclete, meaning
2:04
the belly hill or naval hill of Turkey.
2:07
What shocked archaeologists most was how
2:10
complete and sophisticated the site's
2:12
oldest enclosure was from the start.
2:15
Unlike later monuments such as
2:17
Stonehenge, which evolved over
2:19
generations, Gobeclete's enclosure D was
2:23
finished as a unified complex design.
2:26
12 enormous pillars, some over 5 m tall,
2:30
were carefully positioned in a perfect
2:33
circle, facing inward like the spokes of
2:35
a wheel. Radiocarbon dating showed it
2:38
was built around 9,700
2:41
B.CE, making it the oldest known
2:44
monumental structure in the world, built
2:46
long before farming, metal, or writing
2:49
existed. Strangely, the later enclosures
2:52
were smaller and less refined, as if the
2:55
art and craftsmanship had declined over
2:58
time, an unexpected reversal of what we
3:01
usually see in ancient architecture. To
3:04
understand how such a remarkable site
3:06
came to be, we have to look at other
3:08
nearby communities from the same period.
3:11
About 90 km southwest along the
3:14
Euphrates River, the settlement of Jerel
3:16
Armar was being built. There, people
3:19
were beginning to settle down rather
3:21
than move constantly.
3:23
In the center of that village stood a
3:25
large round mudbrick building, three
3:27
times bigger than any nearby home.
3:31
Inside it was divided into small
3:33
compartments with wooden pillars and
3:35
walls decorated with patterns that
3:37
looked like woven textiles.
3:40
Nearby, orac wild cattle skulls were
3:43
built into the walls, hinting at early
3:45
ritual practices. The repeating zigzag
3:48
lines and animal symbols at Yer Fel Amma
3:52
would later appear again refined and
3:55
magnified in the carvings of Gobeclete.
4:01
Further north at Tel Caramel,
4:04
archaeologists discovered another early
4:05
communal complex. Huge stone towers 6 m
4:10
wide were built with crescent-shaped
4:12
benches and hearths that burned for
4:16
These fires weren't just for warmth.
4:18
They were part of ritual gatherings
4:20
showing that fire had sacred meaning in
4:22
community life. Even hundreds of
4:24
kilometers away in Wadi Fenan, southern
4:27
Jordan, similar semi-ubteran buildings
4:30
appeared. Their snake- like lines,
4:33
massive stone mortars, and decorated
4:36
tools suggest that feasting, craft work,
4:39
and ceremony were deeply connected, and
4:43
that these early people were part of
4:45
wider networks of exchange, not isolated
4:48
groups. All of this evidence points to
4:51
one clear truth. Gobecée did not appear
4:55
out of nowhere. It was the peak of a
4:58
cultural evolution that had been
4:59
unfolding across the fertile crescent
5:01
for centuries. Its beauty, scale, and
5:05
symbolic depth reflect the creativity of
5:07
people living through a time of great
5:10
environmental change. The younger Dryus,
5:13
a sudden cold and dry period that
5:16
reshaped how humans lived. These people
5:19
weren't simply struggling to survive.
5:21
They were finding new ways to come
5:23
together, to create meaning, to express
5:26
shared beliefs, and to build spaces that
5:29
bound them as communities.
5:31
In this light, Gobeclete was never a
5:34
village. It was a gathering place, a
5:37
sacred meeting ground where early humans
5:40
came to celebrate, to remember, and to
5:43
connect. Its pillars, carvings, and
5:46
circles were not homes, but symbols. A
5:49
declaration that humans could shape both
5:52
the physical world and the world of
5:54
ideas. Here, for the first time in
5:57
history, people turned stone into story,
6:01
turning belief itself into architecture.
6:04
Imagine, if you will, being granted the
6:07
extraordinary privilege of stepping
6:09
freely among the enclosures of
6:13
We descend cautiously down a ladder,
6:15
then another, until our feet touch the
6:17
floor of enclosure D, the earliest and
6:19
most elaborately decorated of these
6:21
sanctuaries. Sunlight slants across the
6:24
limestone, revealing every incision,
6:27
every curve, every shadowed relief.
6:30
Animals, abstract symbols, and towering
6:33
anthropomorphic pillars emerge in the
6:36
shifting light. Their presence both
6:38
haunting and commanding. At the heart of
6:41
this egg-shaped space lies two
6:44
monumental teaars, its unmistakable
6:46
focal points. But our exploration begins
6:49
at the edge. Pillar 22 stands before us,
6:53
abstractly human, featureless, yet
6:55
unmistakably corporeal. A snake and a
6:59
fox ripple across its face in delicate
7:01
relief. Moving clockwise, pillar 21
7:05
presents a gazelle, a wild ass, and a
7:07
creature we cannot readily name. On
7:10
pillar 20, wild cattle, a leaping fox,
7:13
and a lizard appear. Each line carved
7:16
with studded intent. Pillars 26 and 28
7:20
displays poised along their inward
7:22
edges, frozen in motion, yet alive
7:25
within the stone. The animals here are
7:28
not domesticated. They are the quarry of
7:31
hunters. Boars, foxes, gazels, ducks,
7:35
creatures of the chase speak to a people
7:37
deeply bound to the rhythms of the hunt.
7:41
Tens of thousands of fractured and
7:43
marked bones unearthed from the site
7:46
attest to communal feasts and ritual
7:48
gatherings centered on this primal act.
7:51
Yet among these familiar forms appear
7:54
more dangerous beings, snakes,
7:57
scorpions, spiders. Their presence
8:00
gestures toward a realm beyond
8:02
sustenance, toward myth, danger, and the
8:05
sacred. At the southwestern edge, pillar
8:08
33 commands attention. Cranes march
8:11
across its capstone, their long necks
8:14
carved with fluid precision. At the
8:17
base, the enigmatic H symbol appears,
8:20
neither letter nor ornament, but a
8:22
deliberate sign whose meaning is now
8:25
lost. around it. Serpents coil and
8:28
weave, guiding the eye along the narrow
8:31
edge, while a six-legged spider asserts
8:33
itself within this ritual tableau.
8:36
Then rises pillar 43, the famed vulture
8:40
stone, the zenith of symbolic
8:43
expression. A goose-like bird supports a
8:46
headless phallic human figure. A
8:49
scorpion crouches below. Serpents,
8:52
cranes, bors, and geometric motifs
8:55
interlace the surface in a dense
8:57
choreography of meaning. Every relief
8:59
feels purposeful, every form a fragment
9:02
of an ancient cosmology rendered in
9:04
stone. At the center stand the two
9:07
tallest pillars, 18 and 31, like
9:11
sentinels presiding over the circle.
9:14
Carved arms run down their narrow edges,
9:17
confirming their human essence. Pillar
9:20
31 bears a necklace formed from a
9:22
buchranium and a belt adorned with
9:24
crescents and H symbols. Pillar 18 wears
9:28
an even richer ensemble, an H symbol
9:31
pendant, a circumpunct, a crescent, and
9:34
a belt clasped with intertwined
9:36
serpents. Fox pelts hang from their
9:39
waists, and living foxes are etched in
9:42
the crooks of their arms. These
9:44
adornments speak of mythic beings or
9:47
divine intermediaries, figures of power
9:50
and reverence. Across enclosure D,
9:53
snakes dominate, 25 in total, followed
9:56
by foxes, ducks, cranes, and oroxs.
10:00
Bors, wild sheep, asiatic asses, gazels,
10:04
vultures, geese, scorpions, spiders, and
10:07
great cats complete the menagerie.
10:10
Alongside them, abstract signs, the H
10:13
symbol, circumunct and crescent, compose
10:16
a separate pictorial language, one
10:19
silent now, yet unmistakably deliberate,
10:22
carrying meanings that once bound a
10:24
people, their rituals, and their gods.
10:27
Walking among these teaars feels like
10:30
turning the pages of a stone picture
10:31
book. Each carving tells a story about
10:34
the beliefs and imagination of a society
10:37
standing at the very beginning of the
10:39
Neolithic age. The size of these stones,
10:42
their carving, transport, and careful
10:45
placement reveals something
10:46
extraordinary. People were working
10:49
together on a scale that shows a new
10:51
kind of shared purpose. Here in this
10:55
limestone sanctuary, the minds of hunter
10:58
gatherers began to change. ritual,
11:01
community, myth, and art came together
11:03
to form a new way of seeing the world
11:06
and themselves. Though these pillars
11:09
were later buried, they still speak
11:11
clearly across 11,000 years. Their
11:14
carvings remain sharp, their forms bold,
11:17
their arrangement precise. Gobecé feels
11:20
almost modern in its vision. It is not
11:23
just an ancient site. It is a threshold
11:26
into deep time, a place where we can
11:29
sense the birth of culture and belief
11:32
long before cities, writing or organized
11:35
religion. These carvings record how
11:38
humans began to see themselves as part
11:40
of something larger. How they used stone
11:43
to carry their identity, history, and
11:46
shared life forward through time.
11:50
At the heart of the grandest enclosure
11:52
stands Pillar 18, a massive T-shaped
11:55
figure. It's easy to think of it as a
11:57
god, but its meaning may be more human
12:00
and closer to home. Look at the fox held
12:03
in the crook of its arm. Thousands of
12:06
years before Gobeclete, a grave in
12:09
Jordan revealed a person buried with a
12:11
fox companion. Taming a wild fox
12:14
required great patience and skill,
12:17
qualities deeply respected among hunter
12:19
gatherers. Over generations, the memory
12:22
of such a person could have grown into
12:24
legend. The foxmaster might have become
12:27
an honored ancestor, a figure remembered
12:30
not as divine, but as a model of human
12:35
In this light, the great teapillars may
12:38
not have been gods at all, but
12:40
ancestors, human figures raised to
12:43
monumental scale. Building them was a
12:46
tribute to those who came before, to the
12:48
founders of their world. The symbols
12:51
carved on these stone ancestors were not
12:53
decorations, but signs of identity, a
12:57
kind of early emblem for clans or
12:59
groups. On pillar 18, the belt tells
13:03
such a story. Snakes twist across many
13:06
pillars, not just for their shape, but
13:09
for their motion. A snake's winding
13:12
movement echoed the path of a thread
13:14
passing through a loom. Weaving, a vital
13:18
new skill, allowed people to make nets,
13:20
baskets, and cloth. It was a craft that
13:24
bound their lives together. One pillar
13:27
even shows a carved net pattern held by
13:30
weights shaped like snake heads. The H
13:33
symbol seen on pillar 18's belt may come
13:36
from this same idea. Two snake heads
13:39
joined together. It could have meant
13:42
alliance, a sign that two great weaving
13:45
families had united. Other symbols point
13:48
to different parts of life. The C-shaped
13:51
mark might have been a trader sign.
13:53
Similar shapes appear on stone stamps
13:56
found far from Gbeclete, perhaps marking
13:59
goods like obsidian or fine stone tools.
14:03
The round circumunct symbol, like a
14:05
circle with a dot in the middle,
14:07
probably stood for something central to
14:09
their way of life, feasting.
14:12
Archaeologists have uncovered huge stone
14:14
troughs that could hold over 150 L along
14:18
with circular stone plates. These
14:21
weren't for everyday meals, but for
14:23
great gatherings filled with food and
14:25
drink, beer or wine brewed for
14:28
celebration. Such feasts built
14:31
friendships and shared identity, and the
14:34
symbol of a bowl or plate may have
14:36
represented that bond of abundance.
14:39
We can imagine people arriving from
14:41
nearby valleys and distant hills,
14:44
gathering beneath the gaze of their
14:46
stone ancestors. The pillars wore the
14:49
signs of their world. The weaver's
14:51
snake, the trader's mark, the feasters's
14:54
bowl, the chief's fox. Here they came to
14:58
celebrate, to tell stories, to honor
15:01
those who shaped their lives. Under the
15:04
watchful eyes of the teaillars, they
15:05
feasted and remembered. The stories they
15:09
told were not just myths. They were
15:11
their history, carved forever into
15:14
stone. Since Gobec Leepe was first
15:16
revealed to the world in the early
15:18
2000s, a powerful story has taken hold
15:22
in the public imagination.
15:24
Across news articles, documentaries, and
15:27
the endless echo of the internet, the
15:29
site is often summed up in a single
15:31
phrase, the world's oldest temple. It's
15:35
an idea that's easy to picture. A sacred
15:37
place where wandering stone age people
15:39
gathered from far and wide to worship,
15:42
make offerings, and hold ceremonies
15:44
beneath giant T-shaped pillars rising
15:47
above the open landscape.
15:50
This idea makes sense at first glance.
15:53
There are no signs of ordinary daily
15:55
life at the site. No hearths where fires
15:58
once burned, no ovens for baking bread,
16:01
no pens for animals or fields for crops.
16:05
The huge stone pillars could never have
16:07
supported normal roofs. Their carved
16:10
surfaces covered with animals and
16:11
strange symbols seem to serve no
16:14
practical purpose. The site's remote
16:17
setting, far from water and farmland,
16:19
makes it feel like a special place, a
16:22
space set apart from everyday life.
16:25
But the story of Gobeclete is not as
16:27
simple as calling it a temple. The site
16:30
suggests a much richer picture. The
16:33
teaars arranged in oval enclosures may
16:36
have once supported light roofs. Stone
16:39
basins, troughs, and channels carved
16:41
into the bedrock hint that water storage
16:44
and plant use were part of the site's
16:46
rhythm. Tools such as sickle blades
16:48
suggest nearby farming or food
16:50
processing. The enormous effort needed
16:53
to raise these stones points to
16:54
cooperation and shared purpose. The
16:58
animal carvings also tell a deeper
17:00
story. The foxes, cranes, vultures,
17:04
snakes, and bo were likely not random
17:07
decorations, but represented different
17:09
social groups or clans acting as emblems
17:13
or totems. These carvings may have been
17:15
a symbolic language helping people
17:17
identify who they were and what they
17:21
Take for example the famous vulture
17:23
stone in enclosure D. The images on this
17:26
pillar seem to tell a story perhaps
17:29
about three major families or lineages
17:32
each symbolized by its own animal. The
17:35
bird, the fox, the scorpion, and other
17:38
figures are part of a social and
17:39
mythological story about alliances,
17:42
heritage, and power. In these carvings,
17:45
everyday life and myth merge, showing a
17:48
culture where nature, memory, and
17:50
identity were deeply connected. Perhaps
17:53
before these stone enclosures were
17:55
built, there were earlier wooden
17:57
versions. In those structures, people
17:59
may have imagined a great bird or totem
18:02
that united their communities. Through
18:05
drumming, dancing, and singing, they
18:07
could have brought the carvings to life,
18:09
giving power to the stone animals. The
18:13
enclosures layout may reflect this
18:15
social organization.
18:17
In the earliest enclosure, the tallest
18:19
pillars rise at the center, decorated
18:22
with foxes, ducks, and abstract symbols,
18:26
signaling the gathering of multiple
18:27
groups. Around them, shorter pillars
18:30
display snakes, wild cattle, gazels, and
18:33
other motifs. Building the enclosures
18:36
demanded organization, likely giving
18:39
rise to hierarchies based on expertise
18:42
and resources. The enclosures were not
18:44
only places of monumental labor, but
18:47
also sites of knowledge exchange, craft
18:50
production, and learning, much like
18:52
temples or marketplaces in later
18:54
societies. The site's location at the
18:57
crossroads of ancient roots across
18:59
southeastern Turkey and northwest Syria
19:02
amplified these interactions. bands,
19:05
clans, herders, and traders could stop
19:08
here, exchanging ideas, goods, and
19:12
Over millennia, this interaction may
19:14
have fostered the need for permanent
19:16
clan houses enclosed by the Teaillars.
19:20
Shamans remained influential, but their
19:22
solitary authority was being
19:24
supplemented and eventually overtaken by
19:27
an emergent elite. This elite combined
19:31
craft, trade, administration, and
19:34
symbolic power, leveraging knowledge of
19:36
weaving and stonework to consolidate
19:39
wealth and influence.
19:42
The monumental work was as much a
19:44
statement of social cohesion and
19:46
technical mastery as it was of ritual
19:50
Over generations, this symbolic system
19:52
spread to neighboring sites such as Nali
19:55
Chry, Hamzantepe, and Kurtik.
19:59
At Nali Chi, sculptures of large birds
20:02
and human-faced birds continued the
20:04
visual language of Gobeclete, but in
20:07
forms suited to domestic or small-cale
20:10
contexts. Stone vessels such as those
20:13
from Kurtepe carried the same symbolic
20:16
repertoire. Intricate zigzags, meanders,
20:19
and lozenes, often combined with animal
20:22
imagery, became markers of prestige and
20:25
identity. These portable symbols enabled
20:28
the dissemination of craft religion
20:30
practices and served as a form of
20:33
advertisement for the clan houses,
20:36
attracting collaborators and allies to
20:38
the growing network.
20:40
By the late 10th and early 9th millennia
20:43
B.C.E., The ideas and social connections
20:46
from Gobec Leeppe had grown into a
20:48
broader culture that spread across
20:50
nearby settlements known as the Shanlurf
20:54
cultural horizon. The symbols evolved
20:57
into new patterns, grids, parallel
21:00
lines, and Vshapes like those on the
21:02
Uran statue. With his calm face, tall
21:06
body, and double V necklace, Ferman
21:09
represents the power and status of the
21:11
early elite. people skilled in craft,
21:14
trade, and ritual whose obsidian eyes
21:17
attest to the far-reaching trade
21:19
networks that supported their influence.
21:22
These networks were practical and
21:24
economic. Obsidian from central
21:26
Anatolia, fine tools, and other special
21:29
goods moved between settlements, helping
21:31
local leaders strengthen their
21:33
authority. Communal buildings allowed
21:36
people to gather for ceremonies and
21:38
decision-making, connecting communities
21:40
through shared beliefs, trade, and
21:42
traditions. By around 7,000 B.CE, as
21:46
Gobeclete's last enclosures were built,
21:49
the huntergatherer way of life had
21:51
climaxed. The social, artistic, and
21:54
trade systems developed here laid the
21:57
foundation for the Neolithic Revolution,
21:59
leading to permanent villages, farming,
22:01
and hering. This change also brought new
22:05
problems. The very systems of monuments,
22:08
rituals, and organized labor that united
22:10
people eventually became too demanding
22:13
to sustain. During this time, people
22:15
relied mostly on hunting and hering,
22:18
farming remained experimental.
22:21
This raises a question. If hunting
22:23
provided enough food, why turn to the
22:26
harder work of farming? The answer lies
22:28
in social and symbolic pressures.
22:31
building communal sanctuaries and
22:34
performing shared rituals required
22:36
stability and cooperation. These
22:38
cultural forces encouraged people to
22:40
settle and cultivate food not just for
22:43
survival but to support their growing
22:46
social world. Environmental changes also
22:49
played a part. The younger dus, a
22:52
colder, drier climate made wild cereals
22:55
and animals scarcer, pushing some groups
22:58
to experiment with planting and animal
23:02
While climate alone did not cause
23:04
agriculture, it was a spark that
23:06
combined with human creativity and
23:09
social needs gradually turned farming
23:12
into a way of life. A striking theme of
23:15
this period is the division of labor.
23:18
Women carried much of early agricultures
23:20
burden, grinding grain, weaving, basket
23:24
making, and child care. These tasks
23:27
caused physical strain, bone
23:29
deformities, and shorter lifespans
23:32
compared to men. Men faced dangers in
23:35
hunting and hering, but their work was
23:40
This shows that agriculture, while
23:42
bringing stability, had great social and
23:44
physical costs, especially for women.
23:47
Ritual and religion were closely tied to
23:50
power. The skull building at Taionu with
23:53
its human remains and traces of blood
23:55
suggests rituals included offerings or
23:58
sacrifices. Such acts may have helped
24:00
elites claim divine authority, control
24:03
labor, and manage community tensions.
24:07
Wealth and specialized crafts
24:08
concentrated in the hands of marking the
24:11
rise of early class divisions. The shift
24:14
to farming improved the food supply, but
24:16
also increased hardship. People worked
24:19
harder, families grew larger, and
24:22
diseases spread more easily. Monumental
24:25
projects and ritual duties added to the
24:27
workload. Over time, the cultural
24:30
benefits of Gobeclete's tradition were
24:32
likely outweighed by the physical and
24:35
social costs of sustaining it. The
24:37
Shanlufa Chayion culture peaked through
24:39
symbols, crafts, and monumental
24:42
architecture, uniting people under a
24:44
serpentine theocracy. A system led by
24:47
elites using serpent imagery to maintain
24:50
power. Gobecé acted as a center for
24:54
artisans, traders, and ritual
24:56
specialists. A protoivilization lasting
24:59
over two millennia. Yet, its success
25:02
carried the seeds of decline. As farming
25:05
and settled life became common, people's
25:07
focus shifted. Resources once devoted to
25:10
great monuments faded, weakening the old
25:13
system. Time itself was perceived
25:16
differently. As people built, harvested,
25:19
and settled year after year, they
25:22
developed a stronger linear sense of
25:24
past and future, replacing the cyclical
25:27
rhythm of hunter gatherer life. Later,
25:30
smaller, simpler sanctuaries reflect not
25:32
only fewer resources, but also a loss of
25:35
collective faith in the old religious
25:38
order. Simultaneously, a folk religion
25:41
emerged in homes represented by small
25:44
male and female figurines. These humble
25:47
symbols expressed everyday spirituality,
25:50
challenging the elitees control. As the
25:53
monumental cult lost its grip, tension
25:55
and resistance grew. This unrest reached
25:59
a breaking point. A carving of a woman
26:01
giving birth may have become a powerful
26:04
symbol of renewal and protest. Across
26:07
the region, monuments were torn down,
26:10
statues defaced, and sacred symbols
26:13
destroyed. The great buildings of Sionu,
26:16
including the skull building, were
26:18
burned or dismantled as the people
26:20
turned against the system that once
26:22
bound them. The collapse of the
26:24
Shanlurfa Tayionu culture ended its
26:27
monumental power, but not its legacy.
26:30
The ideas it created, symbolic thinking,
26:33
organized ritual, social hierarchy, and
26:36
a new awareness of time shaped all that
26:39
followed. Even as the temples fell, the
26:41
ways of thinking they inspired survived.
26:44
This collapse was not an end, but a
26:47
transformation, a step toward new forms
26:50
of community and self-standing that
26:52
would define subsequent human history.